In my WinForms application I need to call javascript function from my WebBrowser control. I used Document.InvokeScript and it works perfect with functions alone e.g
Document.InvokeScript("function").
But when i want to call javascript object method e.g.
Document.InvokeScript("obj.method")
it doesn't work. Is there a way to make it work? Or different solution to this problem? Without changing anything in the javascript code!
Thanks in advance :)
The example in the documentation does NOT include the parenthesis.
private void InvokeScript()
{
if (webBrowser1.Document != null)
{
HtmlDocument doc = webBrowser1.Document;
String str = doc.InvokeScript("test").ToString() ;
Object jscriptObj = doc.InvokeScript("testJScriptObject");
Object domOb = doc.InvokeScript("testElement");
}
}
Try
Document.InvokeMethod("obj.method");
Note that you can pass arguments if you use HtmlDocument.InvokeScript Method (String, Object[]).
Edit
Looks like you aren't the only one with this issue: HtmlDocument.InvokeScript - Calling a method of an object . You can make a "Proxy function" like the poster of that link suggests. Basically you have a function that invokes your object's function. It's not an ideal solution, but it'll definitely work. I'll continue looking to see if this is possible.
Another post on same issue: Using WebBrowser.Document.InvokeScript() to mess around with foreign JavaScript . Interesting solution proposed by C. Groß on CodeProject:
private string sendJS(string JScript) {
object[] args = {JScript};
return webBrowser1.Document.InvokeScript("eval",args).ToString();
}
You could make that an extension method on HtmlDocument and call that to run your function, only using this new function you WOULD include parenthesis, arguments, the whole nine yards in the string you pass in (since it is just passed along to an eval).
Looks like HtmlDocument does not have support for calling methods on existing objects. Only global functions. :(
Unfortunately you can't call object methods out of the box using WebBrowser.Document.InvokeScript.
The solution is to provide a global function on the JavaScript side which can redirect your call. In the most simplistic form this would look like:
function invoke(method, args) {
// The root context is assumed to be the window object. The last part of the method parameter is the actual function name.
var context = window;
var namespace = method.split('.');
var func = namespace.pop();
// Resolve the context
for (var i = 0; i < namespace.length; i++) {
context = context[namespace[i]];
}
// Invoke the target function.
result = context[func].apply(context, args);
}
In your .NET code you would use this as follows:
var parameters = new object[] { "obj.method", yourArgument };
var resultJson = WebBrowser.Document.InvokeScript("invoke", parameters);
As you mention that you cannot change anything to your existing JavaScript code, you'll have to inject the above JavaScript method in some how. Fortunately the WebBrowser control can also do for you by calling the eval() method:
WebBrowser.Document.InvokeScript("eval", javaScriptString);
For a more robust and complete implementation see the WebBrowser tools I wrote and the article explaining the ScriptingBridge which specifically aims to solve the problem you describe.
webBrowser.Document.InvokeScript("execScript", new object[] { "this.alert(123)", "JavaScript" })
for you supposed to be like this
webBrowser.Document.InvokeScript("execScript", new object[] { "obj.method()", "JavaScript" })
Related
On my form I have a button click
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
do something
}
How on the click would I load my do something from a text file, for example my text file looks like this:
MessageBox.Show("hello");
label1.Text = "Hello";
on click it does everything in my text file, if possible.
Here is a very simple example, just to prove this is possible. Basically, you use CodeDomProvider to compile source at runtime, then execute using reflection.
var provider = CodeDomProvider.CreateProvider("C#");
string src=#"
namespace x
{
using System;
public class y
{
public void z()
{
Console.WriteLine(""hello world"");
}
}
}
";
var result = provider.CompileAssemblyFromSource(new CompilerParameters(), src);
if (result.Errors.Count == 0)
{
var type = result.CompiledAssembly.GetType("x.y");
var instance = Activator.CreateInstance(type);
type.GetMethod("z").Invoke(instance, null);
}
Edit
As #Agat points out, the OP seems to require a sort of scripting framework (it makes use of label1, a property of the current object), whereas my answer above obviously does not provide that. The best I can think of is a limited solution, which would be to require dependencies to be specified explicitly as parameters in the "script". Eg, write the scripted code like this:
string src = #"
namespace x
{
using System.Windows;
public class y
{
public void z(Label label1)
{
MessageBox.Show(""hello"");
label1.Text = ""Hello"";
}
}
}
";
Now you can have the caller examine the parameters, and pass them in from the current context, again using reflection:
var result = provider.CompileAssemblyFromSource(new CompilerParameters(), src);
if (result.Errors.Count == 0)
{
var type = result.CompiledAssembly.GetType("x.y");
var instance = Activator.CreateInstance(type);
var method = type.GetMethod("z");
var args = new List<object>();
// assume any parameters are properties/fields of the current object
foreach (var p in method.GetParameters())
{
var prop = this.GetType().GetProperty(p.Name);
var field = this.GetType().GetField(p.Name);
if (prop != null)
args.Add(prop.GetValue(this, null));
else if (field != null);
args.Add(field.GetValue(this));
else
throw new InvalidOperationException("Parameter " + p.Name + " is not found");
}
method.Invoke(instance, args.ToArray());
}
Like the other answers have stated, it isn't an easy thing to implement and can possibly be done through reflection depending on how advanced your scripts are.
But no one #BrankoDimitrijevic mentioned Roslyn and it is a great tool. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/roslyn.aspx
It hasn't been updated in quite awhile (Sept.2012) and doesn't have all of the features of C# implemented, however, it did have a lot of it implemented when I played around with this release.
By adding your assembly as a reference to the scripting session, you're able to gain access to all of your assembly's types and script against them. It also supports return values so you can return any data that a scripted method generates.
You can find what isn't implemented here.
Below is a quick and dirty example of Roslyn that I just wrote and tested. Should work right out of box after installing Roslyn from NuGet. The small bloat at the initialization of the script engine can easily be wrapped up in a helper class or method.
The key is passing in a HostObject. It can be anything. Once you do, your script will have full access to the properties. Notice that you just call the properties and not the host object in the script.
Basically, your host object will contain properties of the data you need for your script. Don't necessarily think of your host object as just a single data object, but rather a configuration.
public class MyHostObject
{
public string Value1 { get; set; }
public string Value2 { get; set; }
}
public class RoslynTest
{
public void Test()
{
var myHostObject = new MyHostObject
{
Value1 = "Testing Value 1",
Value2 = "This is Value 2"
};
var engine = new ScriptEngine();
var session = engine.CreateSession(myHostObject);
session.AddReference(myHostObject.GetType().Assembly.Location);
session.AddReference("System");
session.AddReference("System.Core");
session.ImportNamespace("System");
// "Execute" our method so we can call it.
session.Execute("public string UpdateHostObject() { Value1 = \"V1\"; Value2 = \"V2\"; return Value1 + Value2;}");
var s = session.Execute<string>("UpdateHostObject()");
//s will return "V1V2" and your instance of myHostObject was also changed.
}
}
No. You can not.
At least in any simple way.
The thing you want is something like eval('do something') from javascript.
That's not possible to do with C#. C# is a language which needs compilation before execution unlike javascript (for instance).
The only way to implement that is to build your own (pretty complicated as for beginner) parser and execute it in such way.
UPDATED:
Actually, as JDB fairly noticed, that's really not the only way. I love programming! There are so many ways to make a freakky (or even sometimes that really can be necessary for some custom interesting tasks (or even learning)!) code. he he
Another approach I've got in my mind is building some .cs file, then compiling it on-the-fly and working with it as some assembly or some other module. Right.
I'm quite new in programming multi-threading and I could not understand from the xelium example how I could execute a javascript and get the return value.
I have tested:
browser.GetMainFrame().ExecuteJavaScript("SetContent('my Text.')", null, 0);
the javascript is executed, but I this function don’t allow me to get the return value.
I should execute the following function to get all the text the user have written in the box..
browser.GetMainFrame().ExecuteJavaScript("getContent('')", null, 0);
the function TryEval should do this…
browser.GetMainFrame().V8Context.TryEval("GetDirtyFlag", out returninformation , out exx);
But this function can’t be called from the browser, I think it must be called from the renderer? How can I do so?
I couldn’t understand the explanations about CefRenderProcessHandler and OnProcessMessageReceived.. How to register a Scriptable Object and set my javascript & parameters?
Thx for any suggestions how I could solve this!
I have been struggling with this as well. I do not think there is a way to do this synchronously...or easily :)
Perhaps what can be done is this:
From browser do sendProcessMessage with all JS information to renderer
process. You can pass all kinds of parameters to this call in a structured way so encapsulating the JS method name and params in order should not be difficult to do.
In renderer process (RenderProcessHandler onProcessMessageReceived method) do TryEval on the V8Context and get the return value via out parameters and sendProcessMessage back to the
browser process with the JS return value (Note that this supports ordinary return semantics from your JS method).You get the browser instance reference in the onProcessMessageReceived so it is as easy as this (mixed pseudo code)
browser.GetMainFrame().CefV8Context.tryEval(js-code,out retValue, out exception);
process retValue;
browser.sendProcessMessage(...);
Browser will get a callback in the WebClient in onProcessMessageReceived.
There is nothing special here in terms of setting up JS. I have for example a loaded html page with a js function in it. It takes a param as input and returns a string. in js-code parameter to TryEval I simply provide this value:
"myJSFunctionName('here I am - input param')"
It is slightly convoluted but seems like a neat workable approach - better than doing ExecuteJavaScript and posting results via XHR on custom handler in my view.
I tried this and it does work quite well indeed....and is not bad as it is all non-blocking. The wiring in the browser process needs to be done to process the response properly.
This can be extended and built into a set of classes to abstract this out for all kinds of calls..
Take a look at the Xilium demo app. Most of the necessary wiring is already there for onProcessMessage - do a global search. Look for
DemoRendererProcessHandler.cs - renderer side this is where you will invoke tryEval
DemoApp.cs - this is browser side, look for sendProcessMessage - this will initiate your JS invocation process.
WebClient.cs - this is browser side. Here you receive messages from renderer with return value from your JS
Cheers.
I resolved this problem by returning the result value from my JavaScript function back to Xilium host application via an ajax call to a custom scheme handler. According to Xilium's author fddima it is the easiest way to do IPC.
You can find an example of how to implement a scheme handler in the Xilium's demo app.
Check out this post: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cefglue/CziVAo8Ojg4
using System;
using System.Windows.Forms;
using Xilium.CefGlue;
using Xilium.CefGlue.WindowsForms;
namespace CefGlue3
{
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private CefWebBrowser browser;
public Form1()
{
InitializeCef();
InitializeComponent();
}
private static void InitializeCef()
{
CefRuntime.Load();
CefMainArgs cefArgs = new CefMainArgs(new[] {"--force-renderer-accessibility"});
CefApplication cefApp = new CefApplication();
CefRuntime.ExecuteProcess(cefArgs, cefApp);
CefSettings cefSettings = new CefSettings
{
SingleProcess = false,
MultiThreadedMessageLoop = true,
LogSeverity = CefLogSeverity.ErrorReport,
LogFile = "CefGlue.log",
};
CefRuntime.Initialize(cefArgs, cefSettings, cefApp);
}
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
browser = new CefWebBrowser
{
Visible = true,
//StartUrl = "http://www.google.com",
Dock = DockStyle.Fill,
Parent = this
};
Controls.Add(browser);
browser.BrowserCreated += BrowserOnBrowserCreated;
}
private void BrowserOnBrowserCreated(object sender, EventArgs eventArgs)
{
browser.Browser.GetMainFrame().LoadUrl("http://www.google.com");
}
}
}
using Xilium.CefGlue;
namespace CefGlue3
{
internal sealed class CefApplication : CefApp
{
protected override CefRenderProcessHandler GetRenderProcessHandler()
{
return new RenderProcessHandler();
}
}
internal sealed class RenderProcessHandler : CefRenderProcessHandler
{
protected override void OnWebKitInitialized()
{
CefRuntime.RegisterExtension("testExtension", "var test;if (!test)test = {};(function() {test.myval = 'My Value!';})();", null);
base.OnWebKitInitialized();
}
}
}
The only solution I could find was using:
mshtml.HTMLDocument htmldocu = new mshtml.HTMLDocument();
htmldocu .createDocumentFromUrl(url, "");
and I am not sure about the performance, it should be better than loading the html file in a WebBrowser and then grab the HtmlDocument from there. Anyhow, that code does not work on my machine. The application crashes when it tries to execute the second line.
Has anyone an approach to achieve this efficiently or any other way?
NOTE: Please understand that I need the HtmlDocument object for DOM processing. I do not need the html string.
Use the DownloadString method of the WebClient object. e.g.
WebClient client = new WebClient();
string reply = client.DownloadString("http://www.google.com");
In the above example, after executed, reply will contain the html markup of the endpoint http://www.google.com.
WebClient.DownloadString MSDN
In an attempt to answer your actual question from four years ago (at the time of me posting this answer), I'm providing a working solution. I wouldn't be surprised if you found another way to do this, either, so this is mostly for other people searching for a similar solution. Keep in mind, however, that this is considered
somewhat obsolete (the actual use of HtmlDocument)
not the best way to handle HTML DOM parsing (the preferred solution is to use HtmlAgilityPack or CsQuery or some other method using actual parsing and not regular expressions)
extremely hacky and therefore not the safest/most compatible way to do it
you really should not be doing what I'm about to show
Additionally, keep in mind that HtmlDocument is really just a wrapper for mshtml.HTMLDocument2, so it is technically slower than just using a COM wrapper directly, but I completely understand the use case simply for ease of coding.
If you're cool with all of the above, here's how to accomplish what you want.
public class HtmlDocumentFactory
{
private static Type htmlDocType = typeof(System.Windows.Forms.HtmlDocument);
private static Type htmlShimManagerType = null;
private static object htmlShimSingleton = null;
private static ConstructorInfo docCtor = null;
public static HtmlDocument Create()
{
if (htmlShimManagerType == null)
{
// get a type reference to HtmlShimManager
htmlShimManagerType = htmlDocType.Assembly.GetType(
"System.Windows.Forms.HtmlShimManager"
);
// locate the necessary private constructor for HtmlShimManager
var shimCtor = htmlShimManagerType.GetConstructor(
BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance, null, new Type[0], null
);
// create a new HtmlShimManager object and keep it for the rest of the
// assembly instance
htmlShimSingleton = shimCtor.Invoke(null);
}
if (docCtor == null)
{
// get the only constructor for HtmlDocument (which is marked as private)
docCtor = htmlDocType.GetConstructors(
BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance
)[0];
}
// create an instance of mshtml.HTMLDocument2 (in the form of
// IHTMLDocument2 using HTMLDocument2's class ID)
object htmlDoc2Inst = Activator.CreateInstance(Type.GetTypeFromCLSID(
new Guid("25336920-03F9-11CF-8FD0-00AA00686F13")
));
var argValues = new object[] { htmlShimSingleton, htmlDoc2Inst };
// create a new HtmlDocument without involving WebBrowser
return (HtmlDocument)docCtor.Invoke(argValues);
}
}
To use it:
var htmlDoc = HtmlDocumentFactory.Create();
htmlDoc.Write("<html><body><div>Hello, world!</body></div></html>");
Console.WriteLine(htmlDoc.Body.InnerText);
// output:
// Hello, world!
I have not tested this code directly -- I have translated it from an old Powershell script that needed the same functionality you're requesting. If it fails, let me know. The functionality is there but the code might need very minor tweaking to get working.
I am using dynamic method calls to access a method in a dynamically loaded dll.
I am doing:
dynamic classInstance = Activator.CreateInstance(cmd.Type);
classInstance.AddString(); //This line works
classInstance.AddString(cmd); //this line does not work
The methods in the dll are:
public CustomCommandTest1()
{
}
public void AddString(Command cmd, ExposedVariables exv)
{
exv.ChopResults += "Add string Command";
}
public void AddString(ExposedVariables exv)
{
exv.ChopResults += "Add string Command";
}
public void AddString()
{
string ChopResults = "Add string Command";
}
I can access (call) all the methods that do not have parameters but those that do give me a RuntimeBindingInternalCompilerException. There is no usable info in the exception to try to figure this out.
I have done this before and it has worked. I don't know what I am doing differently here.
Further discovery here reveals that it is related to the complex variable types. Simple builtin variable types works. There is no difference in the definition of the complex variables however as I refer to the definition in a common file.
AddString(cmd) could only work if cmd is actually an instance of ExposedVariables. There's no overload of just
public void AddString(Command cmd)
which is what it looks like you're expecting.
This has nothing to do with complex variable types - it has everything to do with you trying to call a method which doesn't exist. Which overload did you expect to be called, out of the ones you presented to us?
If the cmd variable in your example is a reference to a Command instance rather than an ExposedVariablesinstance, then the call is wrong. You do not have an AddString overload that takes a Command only.
try
ExposedVariables exv = new ExposedVariables();
classInstance.AddString(cmd, exv);
as you don't seem to have an overload that takes just cmd.
I have a class which has the following constructor
public DelayCompositeDesigner(DelayComposite CompositeObject)
{
InitializeComponent();
compositeObject = CompositeObject;
}
along with a default constructor with no parameters.
Next I'm trying to create an instance, but it only works without parameters:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer);
This works just fine, but if I want to pass parameters it does not:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, new DelayComposite(4));
This results in an MissingMethodException:
Constructor voor type
Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayCompositeDesigner
was not found
Any ideas here?
The problem is I really need to pass an object during construction.
You see I have a designer which loads all the types that inherit from the CompositeBase. These are then added to a list from which the users can drag them to a designer. Upon doing so an instance of the dragged is added to the designer. Each of these classes have custom properties defined on them:
[CompositeMetaData("Delay","Sets the delay between commands",1)]
[CompositeDesigner(typeof(DelayCompositeDesigner))]
public class DelayComposite : CompositeBase
{
}
When the user selects an item in the designer, it looks at these attributes in order to load up a designer for that type. For example, in the case of the DelayComposite it would load up a user control which has a label and a slider which allow the user to set the "Delay" property of the DelayComposite instance.
So far this works fine if I don't pass any parameters to the constructor. The designer creates an instance of the DelayCompositeDesigner and assigns it to the content property of a WPF ContentPresenter.
But since that designer needs to modify the properties of the selected DelayComposite
in the designer, I have to pass this instance to it. That is why the constructor looks lie this:
public DelayCompositeDesigner(DelayComposite CompositeObject)
{
InitializeComponent();
compositeObject = CompositeObject;
}
Suggestions are welcome
#VolkerK
The result of your code is this:
<---- foo
Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayCompositeDesignerVoid
.ctor()
Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayCompositeDesignerVoid
.ctor(Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayComposite)
param:Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayComposite
foo ---->
Leppie, you were correct, I had for some reason referenced the Composites assembly in my UI application... which is not something I should have done as I was loading it at runtime. The following code works:
object composite = Activator.CreateInstance(item.CompositType,(byte)205);
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, composite);
As you can see the code does not have knowledge of the DelayComposite type.
This solves the current problem, but introduces many new ones for what I want to achieve,
either way thank you and thank you to everyone who has replied here.
As for the following code, suggested by multiple people:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(
designerAttribute.Designer,
new object[] { new DelayComposite(4) }
);
The Activator.CreateInstance has a signature that looks like this:
Activator.CreateInstance(Type type, params object[] obj)
So it should accept my code, but I will try the suggested code
UPDATE:
I've tried this as suggested:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, new object[] { new DelayComposite(4)});
The result is the same.
I would think that your call would need to be:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, new object[] { new DelayComposite(4) });
Unless, of course, it is that, in which case the answer is not immediately obvious.
I think you are dealing with a Type mismatch.
Likely the assembly is referenced in different places, or they are compiled against different versions.
I suggest you iterate through the ConstructorInfo's and do a paramtype == typeof(DelayComposite) on the appropriate parameter.
Though I hate printf-like debugging ...
public static void foo(Type t, params object[] p)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("<---- foo");
foreach(System.Reflection.ConstructorInfo ci in t.GetConstructors())
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(t.FullName + ci.ToString());
}
foreach (object o in p)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("param:" + o.GetType().FullName);
}
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("foo ---->");
}
// ...
foo(designerAttribute.Designer, new DelayComposite(4));
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, new DelayComposite(4));
What does that print in the visual studio's output window?
If you want to call this contructor...
public DelayCompositeDesigner(DelayComposite CompositeObject)
...just use this:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(DelayCompositeDesigner), new DelayComposite(4));
or
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance<DelayCompositeDesigner>(new DelayComposite(4));
I had a similar issue, however my problem was due to the visibility of the constructor. This stack overflow helped me:
Instantiating a constructor with parameters in an internal class with reflection
I discovered another way of creating an instance of an object without calling the constructor at all while answering another question on SF.
In the System.Runtime.Serialization namespace there is a function FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject(type) that will create an object without calling constructor.
If you look at that function in Reflector you will see it is making an external call. I don't know how black magic is actually happening under the hood. But I did prove to myself that the constructor was never called but the object was instantiated.
When I encountered this problem, I was using a method that returned the parameter list to plug in to Activator.CreateInstance and it had a different number of arguments than the constructor of the object I was trying to create.
In my case, this code work good with .NET Framework but does not work in .NET Core 3.1. It throws ExecutionEngineException which is uncatchable. But when I change target to .NET 5, it works perfectly. Hope this help some one.
Type type = assembly.GetType(dllName + ".dll");
Activator.CreateInstance(type ), new Stream[] { stream };
You can use the following overload on CreateInstance:
public static Object CreateInstance(
Type type,
Object[] args
)
And in your case it'd be (I think):
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(
typeof(DelayCompositeDesigner),
new object[] { new DelayComposite(4) }
);
I found a solution to the problem, I was struggling with the same issue.
Here is my activator:
private void LoadTask(FileInfo dll)
{
Assembly assembly = Assembly.LoadFrom(dll.FullName);
foreach (Type type in assembly.GetTypes())
{
var hasInterface = type.GetInterface("ITask") != null;
if (type.IsClass && hasInterface)
{
var instance = Activator.CreateInstance(type, _proxy, _context);
_tasks.Add(type.Name, (ITask)instance);
}
}
}
And here is my class to activate, note that I had to change the constructor params to objects, the only way I could get it to work.
public class CalculateDowntimeTask : Task<CalculateDowntimeTask>
{
public CalculateDowntimeTask(object proxy, object context) :
base((TaskServiceClient)proxy, (TaskDataDataContext)context) { }
public override void Execute()
{
LogMessage(new TaskMessage() { Message = "Testing" });
BroadcastMessage(new TaskMessage() { Message = "Testing" });
}
}