public string F03_veri_textbox(string veriadi3)
{
string Veritext;
Veritext = webBrowser_sample.Document.GetElementById(veriadi3).GetAttribute("value");
return Veritext;
}
I have a webBrowser_sample object in Form1. I use this function to collect data from specific webpage. It is working properly.
I want to use this function from a class.
But when I try to move it, C# says "The name 'webBrowser_sample' does not exist in the current context".
If I define a new webBrowser_sample in the Class, it will create new webBrowser_sample object.
So I can't use it because I use this function to collect data while I am surfing this browser.
Replace 'mytype' with the object type that webBrowser_sample is. You need to pass in a reference to the object, as in the code below. Another option would be to use an extension method.
public string F03_veri_textbox(string veriadi3, mytype browser)
{
string Veritext;
Veritext = browser.Document.GetElementById(veriadi3).GetAttribute("value");
return Veritext;
}
I was looking at the question Use 'dynamic' throw a RuntimeBinderException. I face a similar problem:
Basically, I want to create a "HTML helper" in ASP.NET MVC that uses dynamic arguments, akin to the htmlArguments parameter for many of the existing helpers (more code below):
public BootstrapCell(Action<string> emitContentAction, dynamic args)
View:
#using (grid.Cell(ViewContext.Writer.Write, new {Position = 4}))
{
<p>zomg!</p>
}
However in the naive approach, i get RuntimeBinderException thrown at me, declaring that 'object' does not contain a definition for 'Position', even though when debugging and hovering over the _args variable, it clearly does have a Position property.
The caller and the callee are in separate assemblies. Why is that problem happening?
(The solution to that has been shown in the same question: Manually create an ExpandoObject to hold the args.)
Implementation:
public class Cell
{
private readonly string _tagName;
private dynamic _args;
private Action<string> EmitContentAction;
public BootstrapCell(Action<string> emitContentAction, dynamic args) : DisposableBaseClass
{
_args = args;
EmitContentAction = emitContentAction;
OnContextEnter();
}
protected void OnContextEnter()
{
var sb = new StringBuilder("<");
sb.Append(_tagName);
if (_args.Position > 0)
{
sb.Append(" class=\"offset");
sb.Append(args.Position);
sb.Append("\"");
}
sb.Append(">");
EmitContentAction(sb.ToString());
}
}
[Edited to make clearer that my problem arises when "obviously" the Position property is set. I am aware that if the property never was defined in the first place, an exception must be raised.]
That code is fatally flawed.
It does work, as long as you specify that property:
void Bar()
{
Foo(new {Position = 0});
}
void Foo(dynamic args)
{
Console.WriteLine(args.Position);
}
That will output 0, it will not throw a RuntimeBinderException.
But the purpose of such code is the possibility for the caller to specify only the properties needed and omit the rest.
You are trying to check for this omission via if(args.Position != null). But that doesn't work, it already requires Position to exist.
When you have a look at the routing API of ASP.NET that also supports those anonymous configuration objects you will notice that the type of the parameter is object and not dynamic.
Using object instead of dynamic will enable your API to be used across assembly boundaries.
So how does it work?
Just like in the linked answer, you need to manually create a dictionary of the properties. Whether you use a plain old Dictionary<string, object> or an ExpandoObject is a matter of preference.
Using ExpandoObject will make your code a bit simpler to read and write, but it is not required.
About the actual exception you are getting:
Please note that it tells you it can't find the Position property on object. If it would be an anonymous type that was missing the Position property the exception message wouldn't refer to object but to an anonymous type. Something like this:
'<>f__AnonymousType0' does not contain a definition for 'Position'
I have a member of some class that definition is Like:
public static object CallMethod(Type oType, String sMethodName, params object [] paramenters)
{
/* some code exist here, not required in this scenario */
CarrierContainer cc = new CarrierContainer();
CarrierContainer.SetMethod.SetServiceAndFunction(cc, oType.Name.Substring(1), sMethodName);
foreach (object item in paramenters) { cc.Params.Add(item); }
object obj = WCFClient.ExecuteService(cc);
return obj;
}
and my calling part is like:
return (ID)WCFServiceClient.CallMethod(ServiceType, "Save", this);
now my point is while I have completed type:
return (ID)WCFServiceClient.CallMethod(ServiceType, "Save",
i don't know how many parameters are required for "Save" and i want to show IntelliSense info while typing based on two parameters typed ServiceType, "Save".
Please anyone have suggestion about control IntelliSense info while typing some code in C# editor?
The explicit definition of the method claims:
I don't know exactly how many parameters can be in that array
So what you expect from the IntelliSense is not what defined in the code.
If you want IntelliSense help you, you should explicitly define parameters in function definition.
Other "solution" could be use of the comments in appropriate way.
In my WinForms application I need to call javascript function from my WebBrowser control. I used Document.InvokeScript and it works perfect with functions alone e.g
Document.InvokeScript("function").
But when i want to call javascript object method e.g.
Document.InvokeScript("obj.method")
it doesn't work. Is there a way to make it work? Or different solution to this problem? Without changing anything in the javascript code!
Thanks in advance :)
The example in the documentation does NOT include the parenthesis.
private void InvokeScript()
{
if (webBrowser1.Document != null)
{
HtmlDocument doc = webBrowser1.Document;
String str = doc.InvokeScript("test").ToString() ;
Object jscriptObj = doc.InvokeScript("testJScriptObject");
Object domOb = doc.InvokeScript("testElement");
}
}
Try
Document.InvokeMethod("obj.method");
Note that you can pass arguments if you use HtmlDocument.InvokeScript Method (String, Object[]).
Edit
Looks like you aren't the only one with this issue: HtmlDocument.InvokeScript - Calling a method of an object . You can make a "Proxy function" like the poster of that link suggests. Basically you have a function that invokes your object's function. It's not an ideal solution, but it'll definitely work. I'll continue looking to see if this is possible.
Another post on same issue: Using WebBrowser.Document.InvokeScript() to mess around with foreign JavaScript . Interesting solution proposed by C. Groß on CodeProject:
private string sendJS(string JScript) {
object[] args = {JScript};
return webBrowser1.Document.InvokeScript("eval",args).ToString();
}
You could make that an extension method on HtmlDocument and call that to run your function, only using this new function you WOULD include parenthesis, arguments, the whole nine yards in the string you pass in (since it is just passed along to an eval).
Looks like HtmlDocument does not have support for calling methods on existing objects. Only global functions. :(
Unfortunately you can't call object methods out of the box using WebBrowser.Document.InvokeScript.
The solution is to provide a global function on the JavaScript side which can redirect your call. In the most simplistic form this would look like:
function invoke(method, args) {
// The root context is assumed to be the window object. The last part of the method parameter is the actual function name.
var context = window;
var namespace = method.split('.');
var func = namespace.pop();
// Resolve the context
for (var i = 0; i < namespace.length; i++) {
context = context[namespace[i]];
}
// Invoke the target function.
result = context[func].apply(context, args);
}
In your .NET code you would use this as follows:
var parameters = new object[] { "obj.method", yourArgument };
var resultJson = WebBrowser.Document.InvokeScript("invoke", parameters);
As you mention that you cannot change anything to your existing JavaScript code, you'll have to inject the above JavaScript method in some how. Fortunately the WebBrowser control can also do for you by calling the eval() method:
WebBrowser.Document.InvokeScript("eval", javaScriptString);
For a more robust and complete implementation see the WebBrowser tools I wrote and the article explaining the ScriptingBridge which specifically aims to solve the problem you describe.
webBrowser.Document.InvokeScript("execScript", new object[] { "this.alert(123)", "JavaScript" })
for you supposed to be like this
webBrowser.Document.InvokeScript("execScript", new object[] { "obj.method()", "JavaScript" })
I have a class which has the following constructor
public DelayCompositeDesigner(DelayComposite CompositeObject)
{
InitializeComponent();
compositeObject = CompositeObject;
}
along with a default constructor with no parameters.
Next I'm trying to create an instance, but it only works without parameters:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer);
This works just fine, but if I want to pass parameters it does not:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, new DelayComposite(4));
This results in an MissingMethodException:
Constructor voor type
Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayCompositeDesigner
was not found
Any ideas here?
The problem is I really need to pass an object during construction.
You see I have a designer which loads all the types that inherit from the CompositeBase. These are then added to a list from which the users can drag them to a designer. Upon doing so an instance of the dragged is added to the designer. Each of these classes have custom properties defined on them:
[CompositeMetaData("Delay","Sets the delay between commands",1)]
[CompositeDesigner(typeof(DelayCompositeDesigner))]
public class DelayComposite : CompositeBase
{
}
When the user selects an item in the designer, it looks at these attributes in order to load up a designer for that type. For example, in the case of the DelayComposite it would load up a user control which has a label and a slider which allow the user to set the "Delay" property of the DelayComposite instance.
So far this works fine if I don't pass any parameters to the constructor. The designer creates an instance of the DelayCompositeDesigner and assigns it to the content property of a WPF ContentPresenter.
But since that designer needs to modify the properties of the selected DelayComposite
in the designer, I have to pass this instance to it. That is why the constructor looks lie this:
public DelayCompositeDesigner(DelayComposite CompositeObject)
{
InitializeComponent();
compositeObject = CompositeObject;
}
Suggestions are welcome
#VolkerK
The result of your code is this:
<---- foo
Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayCompositeDesignerVoid
.ctor()
Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayCompositeDesignerVoid
.ctor(Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayComposite)
param:Vialis.LightLink.Controller.Scenarios.Composites.DelayComposite
foo ---->
Leppie, you were correct, I had for some reason referenced the Composites assembly in my UI application... which is not something I should have done as I was loading it at runtime. The following code works:
object composite = Activator.CreateInstance(item.CompositType,(byte)205);
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, composite);
As you can see the code does not have knowledge of the DelayComposite type.
This solves the current problem, but introduces many new ones for what I want to achieve,
either way thank you and thank you to everyone who has replied here.
As for the following code, suggested by multiple people:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(
designerAttribute.Designer,
new object[] { new DelayComposite(4) }
);
The Activator.CreateInstance has a signature that looks like this:
Activator.CreateInstance(Type type, params object[] obj)
So it should accept my code, but I will try the suggested code
UPDATE:
I've tried this as suggested:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, new object[] { new DelayComposite(4)});
The result is the same.
I would think that your call would need to be:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, new object[] { new DelayComposite(4) });
Unless, of course, it is that, in which case the answer is not immediately obvious.
I think you are dealing with a Type mismatch.
Likely the assembly is referenced in different places, or they are compiled against different versions.
I suggest you iterate through the ConstructorInfo's and do a paramtype == typeof(DelayComposite) on the appropriate parameter.
Though I hate printf-like debugging ...
public static void foo(Type t, params object[] p)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("<---- foo");
foreach(System.Reflection.ConstructorInfo ci in t.GetConstructors())
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(t.FullName + ci.ToString());
}
foreach (object o in p)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("param:" + o.GetType().FullName);
}
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("foo ---->");
}
// ...
foo(designerAttribute.Designer, new DelayComposite(4));
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(designerAttribute.Designer, new DelayComposite(4));
What does that print in the visual studio's output window?
If you want to call this contructor...
public DelayCompositeDesigner(DelayComposite CompositeObject)
...just use this:
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(DelayCompositeDesigner), new DelayComposite(4));
or
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance<DelayCompositeDesigner>(new DelayComposite(4));
I had a similar issue, however my problem was due to the visibility of the constructor. This stack overflow helped me:
Instantiating a constructor with parameters in an internal class with reflection
I discovered another way of creating an instance of an object without calling the constructor at all while answering another question on SF.
In the System.Runtime.Serialization namespace there is a function FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject(type) that will create an object without calling constructor.
If you look at that function in Reflector you will see it is making an external call. I don't know how black magic is actually happening under the hood. But I did prove to myself that the constructor was never called but the object was instantiated.
When I encountered this problem, I was using a method that returned the parameter list to plug in to Activator.CreateInstance and it had a different number of arguments than the constructor of the object I was trying to create.
In my case, this code work good with .NET Framework but does not work in .NET Core 3.1. It throws ExecutionEngineException which is uncatchable. But when I change target to .NET 5, it works perfectly. Hope this help some one.
Type type = assembly.GetType(dllName + ".dll");
Activator.CreateInstance(type ), new Stream[] { stream };
You can use the following overload on CreateInstance:
public static Object CreateInstance(
Type type,
Object[] args
)
And in your case it'd be (I think):
var designer = Activator.CreateInstance(
typeof(DelayCompositeDesigner),
new object[] { new DelayComposite(4) }
);
I found a solution to the problem, I was struggling with the same issue.
Here is my activator:
private void LoadTask(FileInfo dll)
{
Assembly assembly = Assembly.LoadFrom(dll.FullName);
foreach (Type type in assembly.GetTypes())
{
var hasInterface = type.GetInterface("ITask") != null;
if (type.IsClass && hasInterface)
{
var instance = Activator.CreateInstance(type, _proxy, _context);
_tasks.Add(type.Name, (ITask)instance);
}
}
}
And here is my class to activate, note that I had to change the constructor params to objects, the only way I could get it to work.
public class CalculateDowntimeTask : Task<CalculateDowntimeTask>
{
public CalculateDowntimeTask(object proxy, object context) :
base((TaskServiceClient)proxy, (TaskDataDataContext)context) { }
public override void Execute()
{
LogMessage(new TaskMessage() { Message = "Testing" });
BroadcastMessage(new TaskMessage() { Message = "Testing" });
}
}