I have some data in a List of User defined types that contains the following data:
name, study, group, result, date. Now I want to obtain the name, study and group and then a calculation based onthe result and date. The calculation is effectively:
log(result).where max(date) minus log(result).where min(date)
There are only two dates for each name/study/group, so the result from the maximum data (log) minus the result from the minumum date (log). here is what I have tried so far with no luck:
var result =
from results in sortedData.AsEnumerable()
group results by results.animal
into grp
select new
{
animal = results.animal,
study = results.study,
groupNumber = results.groupNumber,
TGI = System.Math.Log(grp.Select(c => c.volume)
.Where(grp.Max(c=>c.operationDate)))
- System.Math.Log(grp.Select(c => c.volume)
.Where(grp.Min(c => c.operationDate)))
};
Anybody any pointers? Thanks.
It isn't entirely clear how the grouping relates to your problem (what sense does it make to extract a property from a range variable after it has been grouped?), but the part you're having difficult with can be solved easily with MaxBy and MinBy operators, such as the ones that come with morelinq.
var result = from results in sortedData.AsEnumerable()
group results by results.animal into grp
select new
{
animal = grp.Key,
study = ??,
groupNumber = ??,
TGI = Math.Log(grp.MaxBy(c => c.operationDate).volume)
- Math.Log(grp.MinBy(c => c.operationDate).volume)
};
Otherwise, you can simulate these operators with Aggregate, or if you don't mind the inefficiency of sorting:
var result = from results in sortedData.AsEnumerable()
group results by results.animal into grp
let sortedGrp = grp.OrderBy(c => c.operationDate)
.ToList()
select new
{
animal = grp.Key,
study = ??,
groupNumber = ??,
TGI = sortedGrp.Last().volume - sortedGrp.First().volume
};
You have a few syntax problems, you cannot use the results parameter after your into grp line. So my initial attempt would be to change your statement like so
var result =
from results in sortedData.AsEnumerable()
group results by new
{
Animal = results.animal,
Study = results.study,
GroupNumber = results.groupNumber
}
into grp
select new
{
animal = grp.Key.Animal,
study = grp.Key.Study,
groupNumber = grp.Key.GroupNumber,
TGI = System.Math.Log(grp.OrderByDescending(c=>c.operationDate).First().volume)
- System.Math.Log(grp.OrderBy(c=>c.operationDate).First().volume)
};
Related
In the below query I order by "Category1":
var ExampleValues = (from values in ExampleAllRecorsds
group values by new { values.Category1, values.Date.Value.Month } into x
orderby x.Key.Category1
select new ExamplesDto()
{
ExampleId = exampleId,
Row = x.Key.Category1,
Month = x.Key.Month,
}).ToList();
I have other properties that I want to order my query by, depending on another variable. It could be ordering by Category2, Category3, etc.
What I want to do is change the ordering of this query between my CategoryX properties without needing to wholesale repeat the query in a switch statement.
For example, this is how I would think to do it with a switch. Notice that this is repeating a lot of code.
switch(categoryVar){
case "Category1":
var ExampleValues = (from values in ExampleAllRecorsds
group values by new { values.Category1, values.Date.Value.Month } into x
orderby x.Key.Category1 // the only change
select new ExamplesDto()
{
ExampleId = exampleId,
Row = x.Key.Category1,
Month = x.Key.Month,
}).ToList();
break;
case "Category2":
var ExampleValues = (from values in ExampleAllRecorsds
group values by new { values.Category1, values.Date.Value.Month } into x
orderby x.Key.Category2 // the only change
select new ExamplesDto()
{
ExampleId = exampleId,
Row = x.Key.Category2,
Month = x.Key.Month,
}).ToList();
break
...
}
How do I not repeat myself?
If you don't mind using an extra library and are on .net Core you could try:
System.Linq.Dynamic.Core
I'm pretty sure there is a System.linq.dynamic for Framework as well, you can check nuget for both
I've been looking at other threads here to learn how to do a GroupBy in linq. I am following the EXACT syntax that has worked for others, but, it's not working.
Here's the query:
var results = from p in pending
group p by p.ContactID into g
let amount = g.Sum(s => s.Amount)
select new PaymentItemModel
{
ContactID = g.ContactID, // <--- Error here
Amount = amount
};
pending is a List<T> that contains, among other columns, ContactID and Amount, but those are the only two I care about for this query.
The trouble is, inside the the select new, the g. won't give me any of the columns inside the original list, pending. And when I try, I get:
IGrouping <int, LeadPurchases> does not contain a definition for ContactID, and no extension method blah blah blah...
This is the SQL I am trying to emulate:
SELECT
lp.PurchasedFromContactID,
SUM (lp.Amount)
FROM
LeadPurchases lp
GROUP BY
lp.PurchasedFromContactID
You are grouping on the basis of ContactID, so it should be the Key for the result, So you have to use g.Key instead of g.ContactID; Which means the query should be like the following:
from p in pending
group p by p.ContactID into g
let amount = g.Sum(s => s.Amount)
select new PaymentItemModel
{
ContactID = g.Key,
Amount = amount
};
updates :
If you want to perform grouping based on more than one column then the GroupBy clause will be like this:
group p by new
{
p.ContactID,
p.Field2,
p.Field3
}into g
select new PaymentItemModel()
{
ContactID = g.Key.ContactID,
anotherField = g.Key.Field2,
nextField = g.Key.Field3
};
i have tried to manipulate some data using linq query. but i'm not sure the way i did was the best approach.
var makes = (from m in
(from pv in vehicleViews
let make = HttpUtility.ParseQueryString(new Uri("http://www.someurl.com" + pv.Url).Query).Get("Criteria.Make")
select new
{
Name = make,
Y = pv.TotalViews,
})
group m by m.Name into g
let total = g.Sum(x => x.Y)
select new
{
Name = g.Key,
Y = total
}).OrderByDescending(x => x.Y);
is there anyway to simplified this query ?
Thanks
You do have a couple of excess projections, an unnecessary nested select before the grouping, and a use of method syntax that isn't strictly necessary. I beleive the following is equivalent to your query:
from pv in vehicleViews
let make = HttpUtility
.ParseQueryString(new Uri("http://www.someurl.com" + pv.Url).Query)
.Get("Criteria.Make")
group pv by make into g
let total = g.Sum(pv => pv.TotalViews)
orderby total descending
select new { Name = g.Key, Y = total };
The let make = line isn't strictly necessary (you could just group by that value directly) but it does make it clearer what you are calculating.
I've been using 101 LINQ Samples to get my feet wet using LINQ. It's been a good first resource, but I can't see an example there of what I currently need.
I just need to associate a sequential group number with each group. I have a working solution:
var groups =
from c in list
group c by c.Name into details
select new { Name = details.Key, DetailRecords = details };
int groupNumber = 0;
foreach (var group in groups)
{
//
// process each group and it's records ...
//
groupNumber++;
}
But, I'm sure it's possible to use LINQ to also generate the groupNumber. How?
This depends on your exact needs, but you can use:
var groupArray = groups.ToArray();
Similarly, you can use ToList. These data structures are sequential, and each group has an index.
If you do need the index on the object you create, another option is to use Select:
list.GroupBy(c => c.Name)
.Select((details, ind) =>
new
{
Name = details.Key,
DetailRecords = details,
Index = ind
});
this should do the trick:
int groupNumber = 0;
var groups =
from c in list
group c by c.Name into details
select new { Name = details.Key, DetailRecords = details, grpNum = groupNumber++};
if it's just a sequential group number, just use the Count() method on your IEnumerable.
var groups =
from c in list
group c by c.Name into details
select new {Name = details.Key, DetailRecords = details};
for(int i = 0; i < groups.Count(); i++)
{
//Process Records
}
Then, if you need the specific group number, you can just grab i.
I'm new to LINQ to SQL and I would like to know how to achieve something like this in LINQ:
Month Hires Terminations
Jan 5 7
Feb 8 8
Marc 8 5
I've got this so far, and I think there is something wrong with it but I'm not sure:
from term1 in HRSystemDB.Terminations
group term1 by new { term1.TerminationDate.Month, term1.TerminationDate.Year } into grpTerm
select new HiresVsTerminationsQuery
{
Date = Criteria.Period,
TerminationsCount = grpTerm.Count(term => term.TerminationDate.Month == Criteria.Period.Value.Month),
HiresCount = (from emp in HRSystemDB.Persons.OfType<Employee>()
group emp by new { emp.HireDate.Month, emp.HireDate.Year } into grpEmp
select grpEmp).Count(e => e.Key.Month == Criteria.Period.Value.Month)
});
Thanks in advance.
I'm not quite sure where does the Criteria.Period value come from in your sample query.
However I think you're trying to read both hires and terminations for all available months (and then you can easily filter it). Your query could go wrong if the first table (Termination) didn't include any records for some specified month (say May). Then the select clause wouldn't be called with "May" as the parameter at all and even if you had some data in the second table (representing Hires), then you wouldn't be able to find it.
This can be elegantly solved using the Concat method (see MSDN samples). You could select all termniations and all hires (into a data structure of some type) and then group all the data by month:
var terms = from t in HRSystemDB.Terminations
select new { Month = t.TerminationDate.Month,
Year = term1.TerminationDate.Year,
IsHire = false };
var hires = from emp in HRSystemDB.Persons.OfType<Employee>()
select new { Month = emp.HireDate.Month,
Year = emp.HireDate.Year
IsHire = true };
// Now we can merge the two inputs into one
var summary = terms.Concat(hires);
// And group the data using month or year
var res = from s in summary
group s by new { s.Year, s.Month } into g
select new { Period = g.Key,
Hires = g.Count(info => info.IsHire),
Terminations = g.Count(info => !info.IsHire) }
When looking at the code now, I'm pretty sure there is some shorter way to write this. On the other hand, this code should be quite readable, which is a benefit. Also note that it doesn't matter that we split the code into a couple of sub-queries. Thanks to lazy evalutation of LINQ to SQL, this should be executed as a single query.
I don't know if it shorter but you can also try this version to see if it works better with your server. I don't know exactly how these two answers turn into SQL statements. One might be better based on your indexs and such.
var terms =
from t in Terminations
group t by new {t.Month, t.Year} into g
select new {g.Key, Count = g.Count()};
var hires =
from p in Persons
group p by new {p.Month, p.Year} into g
select new {g.Key, Count = g.Count()};
var summary =
from t in terms
join h in hires on t.Key equals h.Key
select new {t.Key.Month, t.Key.Year,
Hires = h.Count, Terms = t.Count};