Related
What I am trying to implement is the following: Let's say we have a number (in string format) "34322". I want to sum the start and end digits, then keep repeating this process on the leftover digits until only two digits are left. In other words:
3+2=5, 4+2=6, 3 (563)
5+3=8, 6 (86)
I have the following method:
string ShortenNumber(string num)
{
int firstDigit = int.Parse(num.Substring(0, 1));
int lastDigit = int.Parse(num.Substring(num.Length - 1, 1));
if (num.Length <= 2)
{
return num;
}
return (firstDigit + lastDigit).ToString() + ShortenNumber(num.Substring(1, num.Length - 2));
}
The above gives the result 563, but stops there. How can I achieve the desired behaviour?
Use recursion on the whole number (34322 or 563), and not on the partial number (432 for instance, when you take out starting 3 and ending 2). So, the function should somehow (you have to code it) calculate output 563 from input 34322, and ONLY THEN use that output 563 as input to the recursive call.
You calculate 563 from 34322 using a loop.
Pay attention, from your answer to my question in comments, there should exist one "% 10" in the code.
Based on the answer from Dialecticus, I have implemented the following solution:
string ShortenNumber(string num)
{
if (num.Length <= 2)
{
return num;
}
string shorterNum = "";
int startIndex = 0;
int endIndex = num.Length - 1;
while (startIndex < endIndex)
{
int firstDigit = int.Parse(num.Substring(startIndex, 1));
int lastDigit = int.Parse(num.Substring(endIndex, 1));
int digitSum = firstDigit + lastDigit;
if (digitSum >= 10)
{
digitSum = digitSum % 10;
}
shorterNum += digitSum;
if (startIndex == (endIndex - 2))
shorterNum += num.Substring(startIndex + 1, 1);
startIndex++;
endIndex--;
}
return ShortenNumber(shorterNum);
}
i am using this binary search algorithm to find items in my array. I am trying to make it so when i search for a value which doesn't appear in the array my program tells me, and it also reveals where the closest items are
Example Array: (4, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Search for 5
Result 6, 7.
Every time i search for something which isn't an element within my array it returns 0, or -1. Can someone help me out, thanks?
public static double BinarySearch(double[] a, double item)
{
int first = 0;
int last = a.Length - 1;
do
{
int mid = first + (last - first) / 2;
if (item > a[mid])
first = mid + 1;
else
last = mid - 1;
if (a[mid] == item)
return mid;
} while (first <= last);
return -1;
}
Suppose you would declare "mid" outside the loop and return it ? Instead of -1 ?
When your array is sorted and the searched value is not found, you will get a mid result pointing to the lower value in the array closest to your search value. The element above your search value is contained in a[mid+1]. Small change:
public static double BinarySearch(double[] a, double item)
{
int first = 0;
int last = a.Length - 1;
int mid = 0;
do
{
mid = first + (last - first) / 2;
if (item > a[mid])
first = mid + 1;
else
last = mid - 1;
if (a[mid] == item)
return mid;
} while (first <= last);
return mid;
}
How do you convert a numerical number to an Excel column name in C# without using automation getting the value directly from Excel.
Excel 2007 has a possible range of 1 to 16384, which is the number of columns that it supports. The resulting values should be in the form of excel column names, e.g. A, AA, AAA etc.
Here's how I do it:
private string GetExcelColumnName(int columnNumber)
{
string columnName = "";
while (columnNumber > 0)
{
int modulo = (columnNumber - 1) % 26;
columnName = Convert.ToChar('A' + modulo) + columnName;
columnNumber = (columnNumber - modulo) / 26;
}
return columnName;
}
If anyone needs to do this in Excel without VBA, here is a way:
=SUBSTITUTE(ADDRESS(1;colNum;4);"1";"")
where colNum is the column number
And in VBA:
Function GetColumnName(colNum As Integer) As String
Dim d As Integer
Dim m As Integer
Dim name As String
d = colNum
name = ""
Do While (d > 0)
m = (d - 1) Mod 26
name = Chr(65 + m) + name
d = Int((d - m) / 26)
Loop
GetColumnName = name
End Function
Sorry, this is Python instead of C#, but at least the results are correct:
def ColIdxToXlName(idx):
if idx < 1:
raise ValueError("Index is too small")
result = ""
while True:
if idx > 26:
idx, r = divmod(idx - 1, 26)
result = chr(r + ord('A')) + result
else:
return chr(idx + ord('A') - 1) + result
for i in xrange(1, 1024):
print "%4d : %s" % (i, ColIdxToXlName(i))
You might need conversion both ways, e.g from Excel column adress like AAZ to integer and from any integer to Excel. The two methods below will do just that. Assumes 1 based indexing, first element in your "arrays" are element number 1.
No limits on size here, so you can use adresses like ERROR and that would be column number 2613824 ...
public static string ColumnAdress(int col)
{
if (col <= 26) {
return Convert.ToChar(col + 64).ToString();
}
int div = col / 26;
int mod = col % 26;
if (mod == 0) {mod = 26;div--;}
return ColumnAdress(div) + ColumnAdress(mod);
}
public static int ColumnNumber(string colAdress)
{
int[] digits = new int[colAdress.Length];
for (int i = 0; i < colAdress.Length; ++i)
{
digits[i] = Convert.ToInt32(colAdress[i]) - 64;
}
int mul=1;int res=0;
for (int pos = digits.Length - 1; pos >= 0; --pos)
{
res += digits[pos] * mul;
mul *= 26;
}
return res;
}
I discovered an error in my first post, so I decided to sit down and do the the math. What I found is that the number system used to identify Excel columns is not a base 26 system, as another person posted. Consider the following in base 10. You can also do this with the letters of the alphabet.
Space:.........................S1, S2, S3 : S1, S2, S3
....................................0, 00, 000 :.. A, AA, AAA
....................................1, 01, 001 :.. B, AB, AAB
.................................... …, …, … :.. …, …, …
....................................9, 99, 999 :.. Z, ZZ, ZZZ
Total states in space: 10, 100, 1000 : 26, 676, 17576
Total States:...............1110................18278
Excel numbers columns in the individual alphabetical spaces using base 26. You can see that in general, the state space progression is a, a^2, a^3, … for some base a, and the total number of states is a + a^2 + a^3 + … .
Suppose you want to find the total number of states A in the first N spaces. The formula for doing so is A = (a)(a^N - 1 )/(a-1). This is important because we need to find the space N that corresponds to our index K. If I want to find out where K lies in the number system I need to replace A with K and solve for N. The solution is N = log{base a} (A (a-1)/a +1). If I use the example of a = 10 and K = 192, I know that N = 2.23804… . This tells me that K lies at the beginning of the third space since it is a little greater than two.
The next step is to find exactly how far in the current space we are. To find this, subtract from K the A generated using the floor of N. In this example, the floor of N is two. So, A = (10)(10^2 – 1)/(10-1) = 110, as is expected when you combine the states of the first two spaces. This needs to be subtracted from K because these first 110 states would have already been accounted for in the first two spaces. This leaves us with 82 states. So, in this number system, the representation of 192 in base 10 is 082.
The C# code using a base index of zero is
private string ExcelColumnIndexToName(int Index)
{
string range = string.Empty;
if (Index < 0 ) return range;
int a = 26;
int x = (int)Math.Floor(Math.Log((Index) * (a - 1) / a + 1, a));
Index -= (int)(Math.Pow(a, x) - 1) * a / (a - 1);
for (int i = x+1; Index + i > 0; i--)
{
range = ((char)(65 + Index % a)).ToString() + range;
Index /= a;
}
return range;
}
//Old Post
A zero-based solution in C#.
private string ExcelColumnIndexToName(int Index)
{
string range = "";
if (Index < 0 ) return range;
for(int i=1;Index + i > 0;i=0)
{
range = ((char)(65 + Index % 26)).ToString() + range;
Index /= 26;
}
if (range.Length > 1) range = ((char)((int)range[0] - 1)).ToString() + range.Substring(1);
return range;
}
This answer is in javaScript:
function getCharFromNumber(columnNumber){
var dividend = columnNumber;
var columnName = "";
var modulo;
while (dividend > 0)
{
modulo = (dividend - 1) % 26;
columnName = String.fromCharCode(65 + modulo).toString() + columnName;
dividend = parseInt((dividend - modulo) / 26);
}
return columnName;
}
Easy with recursion.
public static string GetStandardExcelColumnName(int columnNumberOneBased)
{
int baseValue = Convert.ToInt32('A');
int columnNumberZeroBased = columnNumberOneBased - 1;
string ret = "";
if (columnNumberOneBased > 26)
{
ret = GetStandardExcelColumnName(columnNumberZeroBased / 26) ;
}
return ret + Convert.ToChar(baseValue + (columnNumberZeroBased % 26) );
}
I'm surprised all of the solutions so far contain either iteration or recursion.
Here's my solution that runs in constant time (no loops). This solution works for all possible Excel columns and checks that the input can be turned into an Excel column. Possible columns are in the range [A, XFD] or [1, 16384]. (This is dependent on your version of Excel)
private static string Turn(uint col)
{
if (col < 1 || col > 16384) //Excel columns are one-based (one = 'A')
throw new ArgumentException("col must be >= 1 and <= 16384");
if (col <= 26) //one character
return ((char)(col + 'A' - 1)).ToString();
else if (col <= 702) //two characters
{
char firstChar = (char)((int)((col - 1) / 26) + 'A' - 1);
char secondChar = (char)(col % 26 + 'A' - 1);
if (secondChar == '#') //Excel is one-based, but modulo operations are zero-based
secondChar = 'Z'; //convert one-based to zero-based
return string.Format("{0}{1}", firstChar, secondChar);
}
else //three characters
{
char firstChar = (char)((int)((col - 1) / 702) + 'A' - 1);
char secondChar = (char)((col - 1) / 26 % 26 + 'A' - 1);
char thirdChar = (char)(col % 26 + 'A' - 1);
if (thirdChar == '#') //Excel is one-based, but modulo operations are zero-based
thirdChar = 'Z'; //convert one-based to zero-based
return string.Format("{0}{1}{2}", firstChar, secondChar, thirdChar);
}
}
Same implementation in Java
public String getExcelColumnName (int columnNumber)
{
int dividend = columnNumber;
int i;
String columnName = "";
int modulo;
while (dividend > 0)
{
modulo = (dividend - 1) % 26;
i = 65 + modulo;
columnName = new Character((char)i).toString() + columnName;
dividend = (int)((dividend - modulo) / 26);
}
return columnName;
}
int nCol = 127;
string sChars = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
string sCol = "";
while (nCol >= 26)
{
int nChar = nCol % 26;
nCol = (nCol - nChar) / 26;
// You could do some trick with using nChar as offset from 'A', but I am lazy to do it right now.
sCol = sChars[nChar] + sCol;
}
sCol = sChars[nCol] + sCol;
Update: Peter's comment is right. That's what I get for writing code in the browser. :-) My solution was not compiling, it was missing the left-most letter and it was building the string in reverse order - all now fixed.
Bugs aside, the algorithm is basically converting a number from base 10 to base 26.
Update 2: Joel Coehoorn is right - the code above will return AB for 27. If it was real base 26 number, AA would be equal to A and the next number after Z would be BA.
int nCol = 127;
string sChars = "0ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
string sCol = "";
while (nCol > 26)
{
int nChar = nCol % 26;
if (nChar == 0)
nChar = 26;
nCol = (nCol - nChar) / 26;
sCol = sChars[nChar] + sCol;
}
if (nCol != 0)
sCol = sChars[nCol] + sCol;
..And converted to php:
function GetExcelColumnName($columnNumber) {
$columnName = '';
while ($columnNumber > 0) {
$modulo = ($columnNumber - 1) % 26;
$columnName = chr(65 + $modulo) . $columnName;
$columnNumber = (int)(($columnNumber - $modulo) / 26);
}
return $columnName;
}
Just throwing in a simple two-line C# implementation using recursion, because all the answers here seem far more complicated than necessary.
/// <summary>
/// Gets the column letter(s) corresponding to the given column number.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="column">The one-based column index. Must be greater than zero.</param>
/// <returns>The desired column letter, or an empty string if the column number was invalid.</returns>
public static string GetColumnLetter(int column) {
if (column < 1) return String.Empty;
return GetColumnLetter((column - 1) / 26) + (char)('A' + (column - 1) % 26);
}
Although there are already a bunch of valid answers1, none get into the theory behind it.
Excel column names are bijective base-26 representations of their number. This is quite different than an ordinary base 26 (there is no leading zero), and I really recommend reading the Wikipedia entry to grasp the differences. For example, the decimal value 702 (decomposed in 26*26 + 26) is represented in "ordinary" base 26 by 110 (i.e. 1x26^2 + 1x26^1 + 0x26^0) and in bijective base-26 by ZZ (i.e. 26x26^1 + 26x26^0).
Differences aside, bijective numeration is a positional notation, and as such we can perform conversions using an iterative (or recursive) algorithm which on each iteration finds the digit of the next position (similarly to an ordinary base conversion algorithm).
The general formula to get the digit at the last position (the one indexed 0) of the bijective base-k representation of a decimal number m is (f being the ceiling function minus 1):
m - (f(m / k) * k)
The digit at the next position (i.e. the one indexed 1) is found by applying the same formula to the result of f(m / k). We know that for the last digit (i.e. the one with the highest index) f(m / k) is 0.
This forms the basis for an iteration that finds each successive digit in bijective base-k of a decimal number. In pseudo-code it would look like this (digit() maps a decimal integer to its representation in the bijective base -- e.g. digit(1) would return A in bijective base-26):
fun conv(m)
q = f(m / k)
a = m - (q * k)
if (q == 0)
return digit(a)
else
return conv(q) + digit(a);
So we can translate this to C#2 to get a generic3 "conversion to bijective base-k" ToBijective() routine:
class BijectiveNumeration {
private int baseK;
private Func<int, char> getDigit;
public BijectiveNumeration(int baseK, Func<int, char> getDigit) {
this.baseK = baseK;
this.getDigit = getDigit;
}
public string ToBijective(double decimalValue) {
double q = f(decimalValue / baseK);
double a = decimalValue - (q * baseK);
return ((q > 0) ? ToBijective(q) : "") + getDigit((int)a);
}
private static double f(double i) {
return (Math.Ceiling(i) - 1);
}
}
Now for conversion to bijective base-26 (our "Excel column name" use case):
static void Main(string[] args)
{
BijectiveNumeration bijBase26 = new BijectiveNumeration(
26,
(value) => Convert.ToChar('A' + (value - 1))
);
Console.WriteLine(bijBase26.ToBijective(1)); // prints "A"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase26.ToBijective(26)); // prints "Z"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase26.ToBijective(27)); // prints "AA"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase26.ToBijective(702)); // prints "ZZ"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase26.ToBijective(16384)); // prints "XFD"
}
Excel's maximum column index is 16384 / XFD, but this code will convert any positive number.
As an added bonus, we can now easily convert to any bijective base. For example for bijective base-10:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
BijectiveNumeration bijBase10 = new BijectiveNumeration(
10,
(value) => value < 10 ? Convert.ToChar('0'+value) : 'A'
);
Console.WriteLine(bijBase10.ToBijective(1)); // prints "1"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase10.ToBijective(10)); // prints "A"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase10.ToBijective(123)); // prints "123"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase10.ToBijective(20)); // prints "1A"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase10.ToBijective(100)); // prints "9A"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase10.ToBijective(101)); // prints "A1"
Console.WriteLine(bijBase10.ToBijective(2010)); // prints "19AA"
}
1 This generic answer can eventually be reduced to the other, correct, specific answers, but I find it hard to fully grasp the logic of the solutions without the formal theory behind bijective numeration in general. It also proves its correctness nicely. Additionally, several similar questions link back to this one, some being language-agnostic or more generic. That's why I thought the addition of this answer was warranted, and that this question was a good place to put it.
2 C# disclaimer: I implemented an example in C# because this is what is asked here, but I have never learned nor used the language. I have verified it does compile and run, but please adapt it to fit the language best practices / general conventions, if necessary.
3 This example only aims to be correct and understandable ; it could and should be optimized would performance matter (e.g. with tail-recursion -- but that seems to require trampolining in C#), and made safer (e.g. by validating parameters).
I wanted to throw in my static class I use, for interoping between col index and col Label. I use a modified accepted answer for my ColumnLabel Method
public static class Extensions
{
public static string ColumnLabel(this int col)
{
var dividend = col;
var columnLabel = string.Empty;
int modulo;
while (dividend > 0)
{
modulo = (dividend - 1) % 26;
columnLabel = Convert.ToChar(65 + modulo).ToString() + columnLabel;
dividend = (int)((dividend - modulo) / 26);
}
return columnLabel;
}
public static int ColumnIndex(this string colLabel)
{
// "AD" (1 * 26^1) + (4 * 26^0) ...
var colIndex = 0;
for(int ind = 0, pow = colLabel.Count()-1; ind < colLabel.Count(); ++ind, --pow)
{
var cVal = Convert.ToInt32(colLabel[ind]) - 64; //col A is index 1
colIndex += cVal * ((int)Math.Pow(26, pow));
}
return colIndex;
}
}
Use this like...
30.ColumnLabel(); // "AD"
"AD".ColumnIndex(); // 30
private String getColumn(int c) {
String s = "";
do {
s = (char)('A' + (c % 26)) + s;
c /= 26;
} while (c-- > 0);
return s;
}
Its not exactly base 26, there is no 0 in the system. If there was, 'Z' would be followed by 'BA' not by 'AA'.
if you just want it for a cell formula without code, here's a formula for it:
IF(COLUMN()>=26,CHAR(ROUND(COLUMN()/26,1)+64)&CHAR(MOD(COLUMN(),26)+64),CHAR(COLUMN()+64))
In Delphi (Pascal):
function GetExcelColumnName(columnNumber: integer): string;
var
dividend, modulo: integer;
begin
Result := '';
dividend := columnNumber;
while dividend > 0 do begin
modulo := (dividend - 1) mod 26;
Result := Chr(65 + modulo) + Result;
dividend := (dividend - modulo) div 26;
end;
end;
A little late to the game, but here's the code I use (in C#):
private static readonly string _Alphabet = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
public static int ColumnNameParse(string value)
{
// assumes value.Length is [1,3]
// assumes value is uppercase
var digits = value.PadLeft(3).Select(x => _Alphabet.IndexOf(x));
return digits.Aggregate(0, (current, index) => (current * 26) + (index + 1));
}
In perl, for an input of 1 (A), 27 (AA), etc.
sub excel_colname {
my ($idx) = #_; # one-based column number
--$idx; # zero-based column index
my $name = "";
while ($idx >= 0) {
$name .= chr(ord("A") + ($idx % 26));
$idx = int($idx / 26) - 1;
}
return scalar reverse $name;
}
Though I am late to the game, Graham's answer is far from being optimal. Particularly, you don't have to use the modulo, call ToString() and apply (int) cast. Considering that in most cases in C# world you would start numbering from 0, here is my revision:
public static string GetColumnName(int index) // zero-based
{
const byte BASE = 'Z' - 'A' + 1;
string name = String.Empty;
do
{
name = Convert.ToChar('A' + index % BASE) + name;
index = index / BASE - 1;
}
while (index >= 0);
return name;
}
More than 30 solutions already, but here's my one-line C# solution...
public string IntToExcelColumn(int i)
{
return ((i<16926? "" : ((char)((((i/26)-1)%26)+65)).ToString()) + (i<2730? "" : ((char)((((i/26)-1)%26)+65)).ToString()) + (i<26? "" : ((char)((((i/26)-1)%26)+65)).ToString()) + ((char)((i%26)+65)));
}
After looking at all the supplied Versions here, I decided to do one myself, using recursion.
Here is my vb.net Version:
Function CL(ByVal x As Integer) As String
If x >= 1 And x <= 26 Then
CL = Chr(x + 64)
Else
CL = CL((x - x Mod 26) / 26) & Chr((x Mod 26) + 1 + 64)
End If
End Function
Refining the original solution (in C#):
public static class ExcelHelper
{
private static Dictionary<UInt16, String> l_DictionaryOfColumns;
public static ExcelHelper() {
l_DictionaryOfColumns = new Dictionary<ushort, string>(256);
}
public static String GetExcelColumnName(UInt16 l_Column)
{
UInt16 l_ColumnCopy = l_Column;
String l_Chars = "0ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
String l_rVal = "";
UInt16 l_Char;
if (l_DictionaryOfColumns.ContainsKey(l_Column) == true)
{
l_rVal = l_DictionaryOfColumns[l_Column];
}
else
{
while (l_ColumnCopy > 26)
{
l_Char = l_ColumnCopy % 26;
if (l_Char == 0)
l_Char = 26;
l_ColumnCopy = (l_ColumnCopy - l_Char) / 26;
l_rVal = l_Chars[l_Char] + l_rVal;
}
if (l_ColumnCopy != 0)
l_rVal = l_Chars[l_ColumnCopy] + l_rVal;
l_DictionaryOfColumns.ContainsKey(l_Column) = l_rVal;
}
return l_rVal;
}
}
Here is an Actionscript version:
private var columnNumbers:Array = ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F' , 'G', 'H', 'I', 'J', 'K' ,'L','M','N','O','P','Q','R','S','T','U','V','W','X','Y','Z'];
private function getExcelColumnName(columnNumber:int) : String{
var dividend:int = columnNumber;
var columnName:String = "";
var modulo:int;
while (dividend > 0)
{
modulo = (dividend - 1) % 26;
columnName = columnNumbers[modulo] + columnName;
dividend = int((dividend - modulo) / 26);
}
return columnName;
}
JavaScript Solution
/**
* Calculate the column letter abbreviation from a 1 based index
* #param {Number} value
* #returns {string}
*/
getColumnFromIndex = function (value) {
var base = 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ'.split('');
var remainder, result = "";
do {
remainder = value % 26;
result = base[(remainder || 26) - 1] + result;
value = Math.floor(value / 26);
} while (value > 0);
return result;
};
These my codes to convert specific number (index start from 1) to Excel Column.
public static string NumberToExcelColumn(uint number)
{
uint originalNumber = number;
uint numChars = 1;
while (Math.Pow(26, numChars) < number)
{
numChars++;
if (Math.Pow(26, numChars) + 26 >= number)
{
break;
}
}
string toRet = "";
uint lastValue = 0;
do
{
number -= lastValue;
double powerVal = Math.Pow(26, numChars - 1);
byte thisCharIdx = (byte)Math.Truncate((columnNumber - 1) / powerVal);
lastValue = (int)powerVal * thisCharIdx;
if (numChars - 2 >= 0)
{
double powerVal_next = Math.Pow(26, numChars - 2);
byte thisCharIdx_next = (byte)Math.Truncate((columnNumber - lastValue - 1) / powerVal_next);
int lastValue_next = (int)Math.Pow(26, numChars - 2) * thisCharIdx_next;
if (thisCharIdx_next == 0 && lastValue_next == 0 && powerVal_next == 26)
{
thisCharIdx--;
lastValue = (int)powerVal * thisCharIdx;
}
}
toRet += (char)((byte)'A' + thisCharIdx + ((numChars > 1) ? -1 : 0));
numChars--;
} while (numChars > 0);
return toRet;
}
My Unit Test:
[TestMethod]
public void Test()
{
Assert.AreEqual("A", NumberToExcelColumn(1));
Assert.AreEqual("Z", NumberToExcelColumn(26));
Assert.AreEqual("AA", NumberToExcelColumn(27));
Assert.AreEqual("AO", NumberToExcelColumn(41));
Assert.AreEqual("AZ", NumberToExcelColumn(52));
Assert.AreEqual("BA", NumberToExcelColumn(53));
Assert.AreEqual("ZZ", NumberToExcelColumn(702));
Assert.AreEqual("AAA", NumberToExcelColumn(703));
Assert.AreEqual("ABC", NumberToExcelColumn(731));
Assert.AreEqual("ACQ", NumberToExcelColumn(771));
Assert.AreEqual("AYZ", NumberToExcelColumn(1352));
Assert.AreEqual("AZA", NumberToExcelColumn(1353));
Assert.AreEqual("AZB", NumberToExcelColumn(1354));
Assert.AreEqual("BAA", NumberToExcelColumn(1379));
Assert.AreEqual("CNU", NumberToExcelColumn(2413));
Assert.AreEqual("GCM", NumberToExcelColumn(4823));
Assert.AreEqual("MSR", NumberToExcelColumn(9300));
Assert.AreEqual("OMB", NumberToExcelColumn(10480));
Assert.AreEqual("ULV", NumberToExcelColumn(14530));
Assert.AreEqual("XFD", NumberToExcelColumn(16384));
}
Sorry, this is Python instead of C#, but at least the results are correct:
def excel_column_number_to_name(column_number):
output = ""
index = column_number-1
while index >= 0:
character = chr((index%26)+ord('A'))
output = output + character
index = index/26 - 1
return output[::-1]
for i in xrange(1, 1024):
print "%4d : %s" % (i, excel_column_number_to_name(i))
Passed these test cases:
Column Number: 494286 => ABCDZ
Column Number: 27 => AA
Column Number: 52 => AZ
For what it is worth, here is Graham's code in Powershell:
function ConvertTo-ExcelColumnID {
param (
[parameter(Position = 0,
HelpMessage = "A 1-based index to convert to an excel column ID. e.g. 2 => 'B', 29 => 'AC'",
Mandatory = $true)]
[int]$index
);
[string]$result = '';
if ($index -le 0 ) {
return $result;
}
while ($index -gt 0) {
[int]$modulo = ($index - 1) % 26;
$character = [char]($modulo + [int][char]'A');
$result = $character + $result;
[int]$index = ($index - $modulo) / 26;
}
return $result;
}
Another VBA way
Public Function GetColumnName(TargetCell As Range) As String
GetColumnName = Split(CStr(TargetCell.Cells(1, 1).Address), "$")(1)
End Function
Here's my super late implementation in PHP. This one's recursive. I wrote it just before I found this post. I wanted to see if others had solved this problem already...
public function GetColumn($intNumber, $strCol = null) {
if ($intNumber > 0) {
$intRem = ($intNumber - 1) % 26;
$strCol = $this->GetColumn(intval(($intNumber - $intRem) / 26), sprintf('%s%s', chr(65 + $intRem), $strCol));
}
return $strCol;
}
I am trying to write a method to calculate the sum of the odd numbers in all the numbers less than the given number. so eg. CalcOdd(7) would return 5 + 3 + 1 = 9. CalcOdd (10) would return 9 + 7 + 5 + 3 + 1 = 25 etc
The method needs to take in a number, subtract 1, then recursively work backwards adding all odd numbers until it reaches 0. This is what I have so far.
private static int CalcOdd(int n)
{
if (n <= 1)
return 1;
else
if (n % 2 == 0)
n--;
return n + CalcOdd(n - 2);
}
It doesn't work so well, it includes the number passed in in the addition which is not what I want. Can anyone suggest a better way of doing this ? I would also loke to be able to port the answer to work for even numbers and add the option to include the original passed in number in the answer.
Many thanks
Why would you use recursion here? Just loop; or better, figure out the math to do it in a simple equation...
The fact is that C# doesn't make for excellent deep recursion for things like maths; the tail-call isn't really there at the moment.
Loop approach:
private static int CalcOdd(int n)
{
int sum = 0, i = 1;
while (i < n)
{
sum += i;
i += 2;
}
return sum;
}
You could do this with recursion as you say, but if you wish to do it quicker, then I can tell you that the sum of the n first odd numbers is equal to n*n.
private static int CalcOdd(int n) {
if (n<=1)
return 0;
if (n%2 == 1)
n--;
int k = n/2;
return k*k;
}
The reason this works is:
Every even number is of the form 2k, and the odd number before it is 2k-1.
Because 2*1-1 = 1, there are k odd numbers below 2k.
If n is odd, we don't want to include it, so we simply go down to the even number below it and we automatically have what we want.
Edited to fix broken code.
the sum of odd numbers less than a given number is a perfect square.
get the whole part of (n/2) to get the number of odd number less than itself.
square that and voila!
private static int CalcSumOdd(int n)
{
int i;
int.tryParse(n / 2, out i);
return i*i;
}
for even numbers its:
int i = n/2;
return i*(i+1);
correction. The above "even number sum" includes the original number "n". ie fn(12) = 42 = 2 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 10 + 12
if you want to exclude it, you should either unilaterally exclude it, or remove it with logic based on a passed in parameter.
Here is a correction,
int CalcOdd(int n)
{
n--; // <----
if (n <= 1)
return 0; // <----
else
if (n % 2 == 0)
n--;
return n + CalcOdd(n); // <----
}
i'm new here but this seems like a silly recursion exercise, given it can be done with a simple equation:
int sum(n,isEven,notFirst) {
int c=1; //skip the else
if (isEven) c=2;
if (notFirst) n-=2;
return ((n+c)*((n+c)/2))/2; }
classic discrete math sum series..
sum from 1 to 100 (odds and evens) is ((100+1)*(100/2))=5050
edit: in my code here, if you're calculating the sum of odds with n being even, or vice versa, it doesn't work, but i'm not going to put the work into that (and slop the code) right now. i'll assume your code will take care of that by the time it hits the function.. for example 7/2 isn't an int (obviously)
Why use recursion?
private Int32 CalcOdd(Int32 value)
{
Int32 r = 0;
{
while (value >= 1)
{
value--;
if (value % 2 != 0)
{
r += value;
}
}
}
return r;
}
Use a helper function. CalcOdd consists of testing n to see if it is even or odd; if it is even, return helper(n); if it is odd, return helper(n-2).
The helper function must handle three cases:
1) n is less than 1; in this case return 0.
2) n is even, in this case return helper(n-1).
3) n is odd, in this case return n+helper(n-1).
public static int CalcOdd(int n) {
// Find the highest even number. (Either n, or n-1.)
// Divide that by 2, and the answer should be the square of that number.
n = (n & 0x3FFFFFFE) >> 1;
return (int)Math.Pow(n, 2);
}
private static int CalcOdd(int n) {
n -= 1;
if ((n & 1) == 0) n--;
if (n <= 1) return 1;
return n + CalcOdd(n - 1);
}
But I would say doing loops is better and cleaner.
private static int CalcOdd(int n) {
int i, r = 1;
for (i = 3; i < n; i+=2)
r += i;
return r;
}
Since you want the option of including or excluding the first answer (and, keeping your "recursion" constraint in mind):
int calcOdd(int n, bool includeN)
{
if( !includeN )
return calcOdd(n-1, true);
if(n<=1)
return 1;
else
if(n%2 == 0)
n--;
return n+calcOdd(n-1, true);
}
The includeFirst, if passed as true, will include n in the calculations. Otherwise, the next layer down will start "including N".
Granted, as others have said, this is a horribly inefficient use of recursion, but... If you like recursion, try Haskell. It's a language built almost entirely on the concept.
int CalcOdd(int n)
{
n -= 1;
if (n <= 0)
return 0;
if (n % 2 == 0)
n--;
return n + CalcOdd(n);
}
This function is also recursive, and it has parameters which makes you able to decide wether to do even or odd number and wether you want to include the first number or not. If you are confused as to how it works, remember that bools also can be seen as 1 (true) and 0 (false)
int Calc(int n, bool even = false, bool includeFirst = false)
{
n -= !includeFirst;
if (n <= 0)
return 0;
if (n % 2 == even)
n--;
return n + Calc(n - includeFirst, even);
}
Håkon, I have ported your code to c# in VS 2008 as follows
static int Calc(int n, bool bEven, bool bIncludeFirst)
{
int iEven = Bool2Int(bEven);
int iIncludeFirst = Bool2Int(bIncludeFirst);
n -= 1 - iIncludeFirst;
if (n <= 0)
return 0;
if (n % 2 == iEven)
n--;
return n + Calc(n - iIncludeFirst, bEven, bIncludeFirst);
}
private static int Bool2Int(bool b)
{
return b ? 1 : 0;
}
It seems to be working. Now is there anything I can do to optomise ? i.e. I dont want to have to parse those bools to ints every time etc ?
I'd isolate the 'make it odd' part from the 'sum every other descending number' part: (forgive the Python)
def sumEveryTwoRecursive(n):
if n <= 0:
return 0
return n + sumEveryTwoRecursive(n - 2)
def calcOdd(n):
return sumEveryTwoRecursive(n - (2 if n % 2 else 1))
Just because there isn't one here yet, I've decided to use the LINQ hammer on this nail...
(borrowed from Nick D and Jason's pair programmed answer here)
void Main()
{
GetIterator(7, true, false).Sum().Dump();
// Returns 9
GetIterator(10, true, false).Sum().Dump();
// Returns 25
}
public IEnumerable<int> GetIterator(int n, bool isOdd, bool includeOriginal)
{
if (includeOriginal)
n++;
if (isOdd)
return GetIterator(n, 1);
else
return GetIterator(n, 0);
}
public IEnumerable<int> GetIterator(int n, int odd)
{
n--;
if (n < 0)
yield break;
if (n % 2 == odd)
yield return n;
foreach (int i in GetIterator(n, odd))
yield return i;
}
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int sumofodd(int num);
int main()
{
int number,res;
cin>>number;
res=sumofodd(number);
cout<<res;
return 0;
}
int sumofodd(int num)
{ if(num<1) return 0;
if (num%2==0) num--;
return num+sumofodd(num-1);
}
What is the fastest c# function that takes and int and returns a string containing a letter or letters for use in an Excel function? For example, 1 returns "A", 26 returns "Z", 27 returns "AA", etc.
This is called tens of thousands of times and is taking 25% of the time needed to generate a large spreadsheet with many formulas.
public string Letter(int intCol) {
int intFirstLetter = ((intCol) / 676) + 64;
int intSecondLetter = ((intCol % 676) / 26) + 64;
int intThirdLetter = (intCol % 26) + 65;
char FirstLetter = (intFirstLetter > 64) ? (char)intFirstLetter : ' ';
char SecondLetter = (intSecondLetter > 64) ? (char)intSecondLetter : ' ';
char ThirdLetter = (char)intThirdLetter;
return string.Concat(FirstLetter, SecondLetter, ThirdLetter).Trim();
}
I currently use this, with Excel 2007
public static string ExcelColumnFromNumber(int column)
{
string columnString = "";
decimal columnNumber = column;
while (columnNumber > 0)
{
decimal currentLetterNumber = (columnNumber - 1) % 26;
char currentLetter = (char)(currentLetterNumber + 65);
columnString = currentLetter + columnString;
columnNumber = (columnNumber - (currentLetterNumber + 1)) / 26;
}
return columnString;
}
and
public static int NumberFromExcelColumn(string column)
{
int retVal = 0;
string col = column.ToUpper();
for (int iChar = col.Length - 1; iChar >= 0; iChar--)
{
char colPiece = col[iChar];
int colNum = colPiece - 64;
retVal = retVal + colNum * (int)Math.Pow(26, col.Length - (iChar + 1));
}
return retVal;
}
As mentioned in other posts, the results can be cached.
I can tell you that the fastest function will not be the prettiest function. Here it is:
private string[] map = new string[]
{
"A", "B", "C", "D", "E" .............
};
public string getColumn(int number)
{
return map[number];
}
Don't convert it at all. Excel can work in R1C1 notation just as well as in A1 notation.
So (apologies for using VBA rather than C#):
Application.Worksheets("Sheet1").Range("B1").Font.Bold = True
can just as easily be written as:
Application.Worksheets("Sheet1").Cells(1, 2).Font.Bold = True
The Range property takes A1 notation whereas the Cells property takes (row number, column number).
To select multiple cells: Range(Cells(1, 1), Cells(4, 6)) (NB would need some kind of object qualifier if not using the active worksheet) rather than Range("A1:F4")
The Columns property can take either a letter (e.g. F) or a number (e.g. 6)
Here's my version: This does not have any limitation as such 2-letter or 3-letter.
Simply pass-in the required number (starting with 0) Will return the Excel Column Header like Alphabet sequence for passed-in number:
private string GenerateSequence(int num)
{
string str = "";
char achar;
int mod;
while (true)
{
mod = (num % 26) + 65;
num = (int)(num / 26);
achar = (char)mod;
str = achar + str;
if (num > 0) num--;
else if (num == 0) break;
}
return str;
}
I did not tested this for performance, if someone can do that will great for others.
(Sorry for being lazy) :)
Cheers!
You could pre-generate all the values into an array of strings. This would take very little memory and could be calculated on the first call.
Here is a concise implementation using LINQ.
static IEnumerable<string> GetExcelStrings()
{
string[] alphabet = { string.Empty, "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K", "L", "M", "N", "O", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "T", "U", "V", "W", "X", "Y", "Z" };
return from c1 in alphabet
from c2 in alphabet
from c3 in alphabet.Skip(1) // c3 is never empty
where c1 == string.Empty || c2 != string.Empty // only allow c2 to be empty if c1 is also empty
select c1 + c2 + c3;
}
This generates A to Z, then AA to ZZ, then AAA to ZZZ.
On my PC, calling GetExcelStrings().ToArray() takes about 30 ms. Thereafter, you can refer to this array of strings if you need it thousands of times.
Once your function has run, let it cache the results into a dictionary. So that, it won't have to do the calculation again.
e.g. Convert(27) will check if 27 is mapped/stored in dictionary. If not, do the calculation and store "AA" against 27 in the dictionary.
The absolute FASTEST, would be capitalizing that the Excel spreadsheet only a fixed number of columns, so you would do a lookup table. Declare a constant string array of 256 entries, and prepopulate it with the strings from "A" to "IV". Then you simply do a straight index lookup.
Try this function.
// Returns name of column for specified 0-based index.
public static string GetColumnName(int index)
{
var name = new char[3]; // Assumes 3-letter column name max.
int rem = index;
int div = 17576; // 26 ^ 3
for (int i = 2; i >= 0; i++)
{
name[i] = alphabet[rem / div];
rem %= div;
div /= 26;
}
if (index >= 676)
return new string(name, 3);
else if (index >= 26)
return new string(name, 2);
else
return new string(name, 1);
}
Now it shouldn't take up that much memory to pre-generate each column name for every index and store them in a single huge array, so you shouldn't need to look up the name for any column twice.
If I can think of any further optimisations, I'll add them later, but I believe this function should be pretty quick, and I doubt you even need this sort of speed if you do the pre-generation.
Your first problem is that you are declaring 6 variables in the method. If a methd is going to be called thousands of times, just moving those to class scope instead of function scope will probably cut your processing time by more than half right off the bat.
This is written in Java, but it's basically the same thing.
Here's code to compute the label for the column, in upper-case, with a 0-based index:
public static String findColChars(long index) {
char[] ret = new char[64];
for (int i = 0; i < ret.length; ++i) {
int digit = ret.length - i - 1;
long test = index - powerDown(i + 1);
if (test < 0)
break;
ret[digit] = toChar(test / (long)(Math.pow(26, i)));
}
return new String(ret);
}
private static char toChar(long num) {
return (char)((num % 26) + 65);
}
Here's code to compute 0-based index for the column from the upper-case label:
public static long findColIndex(String col) {
long index = 0;
char[] chars = col.toCharArray();
for (int i = 0; i < chars.length; ++i) {
int cur = chars.length - i - 1;
index += (chars[cur] - 65) * Math.pow(26, i);
}
return index + powerDown(chars.length);
}
private static long powerDown(int limit) {
long acc = 0;
while (limit > 1)
acc += Math.pow(26, limit-- - 1);
return acc;
}
#Neil N -- nice code I think the thirdLetter should have a +64 rather than +65 ? am I right?
public string Letter(int intCol) {
int intFirstLetter = ((intCol) / 676) + 64;
int intSecondLetter = ((intCol % 676) / 26) + 64;
int intThirdLetter = (intCol % 26) + 65; ' SHOULD BE + 64?
char FirstLetter = (intFirstLetter > 64) ? (char)intFirstLetter : ' ';
char SecondLetter = (intSecondLetter > 64) ? (char)intSecondLetter : ' ';
char ThirdLetter = (char)intThirdLetter;
return string.Concat(FirstLetter, SecondLetter, ThirdLetter).Trim();
}
Why don't we try factorial?
public static string GetColumnName(int index)
{
const string letters = "ZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY";
int NextPos = (index / 26);
int LastPos = (index % 26);
if (LastPos == 0) NextPos--;
if (index > 26)
return GetColumnName(NextPos) + letters[LastPos];
else
return letters[LastPos] + "";
}
Caching really does cut the runtime of 10,000,000 random calls to 1/3 its value though:
static Dictionary<int, string> LetterDict = new Dictionary<int, string>(676);
public static string LetterWithCaching(int index)
{
int intCol = index - 1;
if (LetterDict.ContainsKey(intCol)) return LetterDict[intCol];
int intFirstLetter = ((intCol) / 676) + 64;
int intSecondLetter = ((intCol % 676) / 26) + 64;
int intThirdLetter = (intCol % 26) + 65;
char FirstLetter = (intFirstLetter > 64) ? (char)intFirstLetter : ' ';
char SecondLetter = (intSecondLetter > 64) ? (char)intSecondLetter : ' ';
char ThirdLetter = (char)intThirdLetter;
String s = string.Concat(FirstLetter, SecondLetter, ThirdLetter).Trim();
LetterDict.Add(intCol, s);
return s;
}
I think caching in the worst-case (hit every value) couldn't take up more than 250kb (17576 possible values * (sizeof(int)=4 + sizeof(char)*3 + string overhead=2)
It is recursive. Fast, and right :
class ToolSheet
{
//Not the prettyest but surely the fastest :
static string[] ColName = new string[676];
public ToolSheet()
{
ColName[0] = "A";
for (int index = 1; index < 676; ++index) Recurse(index, index);
}
private int Recurse(int i, int index)
{
if (i < 1) return 0;
ColName[index] = ((char)(65 + i % 26)).ToString() + ColName[index];
return Recurse(i / 26, index);
}
public string GetColName(int i)
{
return ColName[i - 1];
}
}
sorry there was a shift. corrected.
class ToolSheet
{
//Not the prettyest but surely the fastest :
static string[] ColName = new string[676];
public ToolSheet()
{
for (int index = 0; index < 676; ++index)
{
Recurse(index, index);
}
}
private int Recurse(int i, int index)
{
if (i < 1)
{
if (index % 26 == 0 && index > 0) ColName[index] = ColName[index - 1].Substring(0, ColName[index - 1].Length - 1) + "Z";
return 0;
}
ColName[index] = ((char)(64 + i % 26)).ToString() + ColName[index];
return Recurse(i / 26, index);
}
public string GetColName(int i)
{
return ColName[i - 1];
}
}
My solution:
static class ExcelHeaderHelper
{
public static string[] GetHeaderLetters(uint max)
{
var result = new List<string>();
int i = 0;
var columnPrefix = new Queue<string>();
string prefix = null;
int prevRoundNo = 0;
uint maxPrefix = max / 26;
while (i < max)
{
int roundNo = i / 26;
if (prevRoundNo < roundNo)
{
prefix = columnPrefix.Dequeue();
prevRoundNo = roundNo;
}
string item = prefix + ((char)(65 + (i % 26))).ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
if (i <= maxPrefix)
{
columnPrefix.Enqueue(item);
}
result.Add(item);
i++;
}
return result.ToArray();
}
}
barrowc's idea is much more convenient and fastest than any conversion function! i have converted his ideas to actual c# code that i use:
var start = m_xlApp.Cells[nRow1_P, nCol1_P];
var end = m_xlApp.Cells[nRow2_P, nCol2_P];
// cast as Range to prevent binding errors
m_arrRange = m_xlApp.get_Range(start as Range, end as Range);
object[] values = (object[])m_arrRange.Value2;
private String columnLetter(int column) {
if (column <= 0)
return "";
if (column <= 26){
return (char) (column + 64) + "";
}
if (column%26 == 0){
return columnLetter((column/26)-1) + columnLetter(26) ;
}
return columnLetter(column/26) + columnLetter(column%26) ;
}
Just use an Excel formula instead of a user-defined function (UDF) or other program, per Allen Wyatt (https://excel.tips.net/T003254_Alphabetic_Column_Designation.html):
=SUBSTITUTE(ADDRESS(ROW(),COLUMN(),4),ROW(),"")
(In my organization, using UDFs would be very painful.)
The code I'm providing is NOT C# (instead is python) but the logic can be used for any language.
Most of previous answers are correct. Here is one more way of converting column number to excel columns.
solution is rather simple if we think about this as a base conversion. Simply, convert the column number to base 26 since there is 26 letters only.
Here is how you can do this:
steps:
set the column as a quotient
subtract one from quotient variable (from previous step) because we need to end up on ascii table with 97 being a.
divide by 26 and get the remainder.
add +97 to remainder and convert to char (since 97 is "a" in ASCII table)
quotient becomes the new quotient/ 26 (since we might go over 26 column)
continue to do this until quotient is greater than 0 and then return the result
here is the code that does this :)
def convert_num_to_column(column_num):
result = ""
quotient = column_num
remainder = 0
while (quotient >0):
quotient = quotient -1
remainder = quotient%26
result = chr(int(remainder)+97)+result
quotient = int(quotient/26)
return result
print("--",convert_num_to_column(1).upper())
If you need to generate letters not starting only from A1
private static string GenerateCellReference(int n, int startIndex = 65)
{
string name = "";
n += startIndex - 65;
while (n > 0)
{
n--;
name = (char)((n % 26) + 65) + name;
n /= 26;
}
return name + 1;
}