I notice that if you have a private member in a class, you can access it in the class methods by just referring to it's name. You do not need to say this.memberName, just memberName works. So is the this keyword optional in the context of member access?
I do see it is useful when you want to clarify the scope - when you have 2 variables with the same name. Is there any other reason to use it when accessing members?
Yes, it's optional. The only times you'd have to use it are when you have a local variable that hides a member variable, or you want to refer to an indexed property (aka indexer).
You can optionally use this in instance member access from within an instance members like an instance method or property because whenever an instance method is called this (referring to the current object) is automatically passed in as an invisible parameter.
You cannot use this from within static members to access instance member... like you cannot use this.x or this.y (or even simple x and y) from within a static method or property if x and y are instance members. This is because this is undefined in a static member call. The static member belongs to the whole class... it has no idea which instance this is referring to. And that is due to the fact that when you call a static method or property , the call is of the format ClassName.MethodName(); So the static method does not know what object this will refer.
this is also not optional (it must be used) as the first modifier in the parameter list of an extension method. In fact this is what identifies a static method as an extension method. Here now this identifies the first parameter as the instance on which the extension method is working.
using System;
class Class_name
{
static string static_variable="static";
string instance_variable="instance";
static void Main()
{
Class_name object_name = new Class_name();
Console.WriteLine("Printing out instance and static variables from within Main() body :");
Console.WriteLine(object_name.instance_variable);
Console.WriteLine(Class_name.static_variable);
/* Note that we cannot say either of the following :
object_name.static_variable
Class_name.instance_variable
*/
Console.WriteLine();
// now lets call the static and instance methods
object_name.Instance_method(); // Now this is the key call which
// passes "this" as an invisible parameter
// to the Instance_method. "this" refers to
// object_name
Class_name.Static_method();// "this" is NOT passed to Static_method() because now
// the call is made on Class_name ... so there is nothing
// to be represented by "this"
Console.ReadLine();
}
void Instance_method()
{
// here we receive "this" as an invisible parameter referring
// to the object on which Instance_method is called (i.e. object_name)...
// ... see the Main() method for comments at the call site.
Console.Write("Instace method called ... " +
"prints out instance variable twice, with and without 'this': ");
// the following two calls mean exactly the same.
Console.Write(this.instance_variable);
Console.WriteLine (instance_variable);
// one little additional point is that static members are
// accessible from within instance members
Console.WriteLine();
Console.Write("static variables can also be accessed from within Instance_method: ");
Console.WriteLine(static_variable);
Console.WriteLine();
Console.WriteLine();
}
static void Static_method()
{
// See the Main() method body for the call Class_name.Static_method()
// Notice that this method is called on Class_name and not object_name
// which means that there is no invisibly passed-in "this" parameter available
// in this method.
// we can also not access the instance_variable in this method
// as instance variables are always part of some object. This method
// is not called on any object, its called on Class_name.
// Console.WriteLine(instance_variable); // Compiler error
Console.WriteLine("Static method called ... prints out static variable: ");
Console.WriteLine(static_variable);
}
}
Yes, 'this' is implied. It can sometimes help for clarity. And it is also necessary for calling methods and need to reference the current class.
"This" is almost always optional when you call members of current class.
However, it is used for other purposes, e.g. to pass the current class instance as a parameter or to set a property,field or variable to the current instance.
The only case where you must use it to call a method is when you call an extension method:
class AClass {
void CallIt() {
Test(); //not valid
this.Test(); //valid
}
}
static class AnExtension {
public static void Test(this AClass source) {
}
}
Related
Can i access a method from a instance of the class? Example:
class myClass
{
private static int n = 0;
public static myClass()
{ n = 5;}
public static void Afis()
{
Console.WriteLine(n);
}
}
and in the void Main:
static void Main()
{
myClass m = new myClass();
m.Afis();
}
This gives me: cannon be accessed with an instance referece. Is it because i declared the function static? If that is so when should I use static and when not because in c++ if i declare something with static it just initialize once. Is that the case with c#?
You need to use the class name rather than your variable name to access the static method.
myClass.Afis();
I've attached a link to the Static Classes and Static Class Members programming guide as you've asked when you should use them and not use them.
A little exert from the programming guide:
A static class can be used as a convenient container for sets of
methods that just operate on input parameters and do not have to get
or set any internal instance fields. For example, in the .NET
Framework Class Library, the static System.Math class contains methods
that perform mathematical operations, without any requirement to store
or retrieve data that is unique to a particular instance of the Math
class.
Static methods are called through the class itself, not an instance of the class.
static void Main()
{
myClass m = new myClass();
myClass.Afis();
}
That's right - it's a static function and therefore is called like:
myClass.Afis();
Is it because i declared the function static?
Exactly.
If that is so when should I use static
Guess what - from the error: when you do not need to access instance variables.
because in c++ if i declare something with static it just initialize once. Is that the case with
c#?
If you mean a static constructor - yes.
Basically what you have there is not a "class", but a static class that can not be instantiated at all.
Static method is method who connect to the class ad not to instance.
You use this if you want that every instance can use the same method.
For example if I want to count the instances of class I use static property.
To access static methods and properties you have to use the name of the class and not the name of instance.
Yes - as you suspect - you cannot access an static method via an instance of the object, only via the type itself.
In other words:
myClass.Afis();
Naturally - the converse is also true; you cannot access an instance method via the type either.
You can find out more about when to, and no to, use static in other questions such as this one, but I would say that static limits certain desirable things like testability and polymorphism (to name just a couple), and so shouldn't be your "default position".
You marked your method as static. Thus you have to access it via the type.
Static methods are used when the method refers to the type and does not use instance information. String.IsNullOrEmpty(string s) is such a static method. It belongs to the string class but does not need an instance environment. Whereas the ToString() method that every object inherits from object needs an instance context to define what to express as a string.
This question already has answers here:
Closed 11 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
Why can I only access static members from a static function?
While I was trying to call a normal method from inside a static method I got the error:
An object reference is required for the non-static field, method, or property
So this means I need to create the object of the Class and then call the nonstatic method. If I want to call the method directly then I have to declare that method as Static.
But , in this scenario , the calling method and called method belong to same class. So Why do I need to create an object while calling from a Static Method , while I can call a non-static method from non static method.
Ex:
class Program
{
//public void outTestMethod(int x,out int y)
//{
// y = x;
//}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int a = 10;
int b = 100;
outTestMethod(a,out b);
}
private void outTestMethod(int x, out int y)
{
y = x;
}
}
Error:An object reference is required for the non-static field, method, or property
Static methods can call instance methods - but you need to have an instance on which to call them. It doesn't matter where that instance comes from particularly, so for example:
int a = 10;
int b = 100;
Program program = new Program();
program.outTestMethod(a,out b);
Instance methods are associated with a particular instance of the type, whereas static methods are associated with the overall type instead - and the same is true for other kinds of members. So to call an instance method, you need to know which instance you're interested in. For example, it would be meaningless to have:
string name = Person.Name;
because you need to know which person you're talking about:
Person person = FetchPersonFromSomewhere();
string name = person.Name;
... that makes much more sense.
Typically instance methods use or modify the state of the instance.
Consider it this way.
A static method is the button outside a bank of elevators. Anyone can see it and push it, and make something happen (i.e. one of the elevators will arrive at that floor).
The non-static methods are the buttons inside a specific elevator. They manipulate THAT elevator (and none of the others).
A non-static method is also called an instance method. This means there (usually) is a chunk of data, specific to the instance (object) that the method operates on.
You can't call a non static or instance method from a static method because it wouldn't know which instance or object to operate on.
Because there is no instance to call the method from. YOu should create possibly another class and test on that:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int a = 10;
int b = 100;
Test testclass = new Test();
testclass.outTestMethod(a,out b);
}
}
class Test
{
public void outTestMethod(int x, out int y)
{
y = x;
}
}
do you understand the difference between instance method and static method?
an instance method has access to the this object even if it's not passed in as parameter, in fact it's like if it was an invisible parameter of the same type of the class passed for you by the framework.
a static method does not have that this object and cannot call instance methods because it does not have anything to pass for that this in the invisible way...
sounds like a joke but this is the way I see it :)
public static void callit(ref int var)
{
var++;
}
public static void main(Object sender, EventArgs e)
{
int num=6;
callit(ref num);
Console.WriteLine(num);
}
But if here method callit() would not be a static then I had to make object of class then call it.
That's correct. Non-static methods need to be called on an instance of an object. Even if the method doesn't actually use any other members of the object, the compiler still enforces the rule that instance methods require instances. Static methods, on the other hand, do not need to be called on an instance. That's what makes them static.
Exactly because that's the whole point of static methods.
Instance methods require to know which instance of the class you call the method on.
instance.Method();
and they can then reference instance variables in the class.
Static methods, on the other hand, don't require an instance, but can't access instance variables.
class.StaticMethod();
An example of this would be:
public class ExampleClass
{
public int InstanceNumber { get; set; }
public static void HelpMe()
{
Console.WriteLine("I'm helping you.");
// can't access InstanceNumber, which is an instance member, from a static method.
}
public int Work()
{
return InstanceNumber * 10;
}
}
You could create an instance of this class to call the Work() method on that particular instance
var example = new ExampleClass();
example.InstanceNumber = 100;
example.Work();
The static keyword though, means that you don't need an instance reference to call the HelpMe() method, since it's bound to the class, and not to a particular instance of the class
ExampleClass.HelpMe();
I think MSDN explains it very well
Static classes and class members are used to create data and functions that can be accessed without creating an instance of the class. Static class members can be used to separate data and behavior that is independent of any object identity: the data and functions do not change regardless of what happens to the object. Static classes can be used when there is no data or behavior in the class that depends on object identity.
You can find more details about this topic here
This is simply a matter of C# syntax, if I understand your question correctly. There is no ambiguity in using callit(ref num); in your example. It is known exactly what method to call, since it is a static method and there is no object attached. On the other hand, if callit was not static, the compiler would not know the object on which to call the method, since you are calling it from a static method (which has no object). So, you would need to create a new object and call the method on that object.
Of course, if neither method was static, the method call would operate on itself, and again, the object would be known so there is no problem.
Because static methods are associated with the class itself, not with a specific object instance.
Static functions work on classes.
Member functions work on instances.
And yes, you can only call a member function of an object (instance). No instance, no member.
Static methods are called on the type (or class), whereas non-static methods are called on the instance of a type i.e. object of a class.
You cannot call non-static methods or non-static variables in a static method, as there can be multiple objects (i.e. instances of the same type).
Static functions access class variables that are just as accessible by any other static functions AND instance functions. Meaning if you have a class variable called static int count, in static method static increaseCount() { count++; } increases the variable count by 1, and in static method static decreaseCount() { count--; } decreases the variable count by 1.
Therefore, both a static function and an instance function may access a static variable, but a static function MAY NOT access an instance variable.
Static functions are also called class functions.
Non static functions are also called instance functions.
Static method are independent of instance, suppose there is man class in that there is eat method which is non static and there is sleep method which is static then when you create different instance of man lets say man m1, m2. m1 and m2 share same sleep methods but different eat method. In java all static variables are stored in heap memory which is shared all object instances suppose at runtime if static variable changes then it will share on all instances of the object in our case.m1 and m2. But if you change non-static varible it will for only that object instance
m1.anStaticvariable = 1; // changes value of m2.anStaticvariable also
But
m1.nonStaticvariable = 1; //wont change m2.nonStaticvariable
Hope this helps you
How can a static property reference a nonstatic method?
Example:
public static int UserID
{
get
{
return GetUserID();
}
}
private int GetUserID()
{
return 1;
}
When I try to compile this, I get the error: "An object reference is required for he non-static field, method or property "GetUserID()"
This doesn't work.
When you define a static property (or static method), you're defining a property that works on the class type, not on an instance of the class.
Instance properties and methods, on the other hand, work upon a specific, constructed, instance of a class. In order to use them, you need to have a reference to that specific instance. (The other way around, however, is fine.)
As an example, think of Fruit, and an "Apple" class. Say the apple class has an instance property that is how ripe the Apple is at this point in time.
You wouldn't as "Apple" to describe how ripe it is, but rather a specific "Apple" (instance). On the other hand, you could have an instance of an apple, and ask it whether it contains seeds (which might be defined on the Apple class itself (static)).
You'll just have to create a new instance:
public static int UserID
{
get
{
return new MyClass().GetUserID()
}
}
Well, you don't have to create a new instance every time UserId is called -- you can have a static field containing an instance of MyClass instead (which of course would be an approach toward implementing the Singleton pattern).
Although you can read that your static property is calling a method that could be made static, the other method isn't static. Thus, you must call the method on an instance.
You need somehow to get an instance. Without an instance, it's impossible to call an instance method.
For your case, are you sure that you need GetUserID() to be an instance method? It returns anyway the same value. Or, if your code is just dummy, and you require more logic in GetUserID(), maybe you can tell us what you intend to do?
An easy way to think about it is the following: a non-static method (or property, because properties are just wrapped-up methods) receives, as a first hidden parameter, a reference to the instance on which they operate (the "this" instance within the called method). A static method has no such instance, hence nothing to give as first hidden parameter to the non-static method.
Simply it can't.
If you need to call a static method to invoke an instance method, probably you want a Singleton
Try look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern
Example:
public sealed class Singleton
{
private static readonly Singleton _instance = new Singleton();
private Singleton() { }
public static Singleton Instance
{
get
{
return _instance;
}
}
public static int UserID
{
get
{
return _instance.GetUserID();
}
}
private int GetUserID()
{
return 1;
}
}
I have a static function in a class.
whenever I try to use non static data member, I get following compile error.
An object reference is required for the nonstatic field, method, or property member
Why is it behaving like that?
A non-static member belongs to an instance. It's meaningless without somehow resolving which instance of a class you are talking about. In a static context, you don't have an instance, that's why you can't access a non-static member without explicitly mentioning an object reference.
In fact, you can access a non-static member in a static context by specifying the object reference explicitly:
class HelloWorld {
int i;
public HelloWorld(int i) { this.i = i; }
public static void Print(HelloWorld instance) {
Console.WriteLine(instance.i);
}
}
var test = new HelloWorld(1);
var test2 = new HelloWorld(2);
HelloWorld.Print(test);
Without explicitly referring to the instance in the Print method, how would it know it should print 1 and not 2?
Instance methods rely on state of that particular instance in order to run.
Let's say you had this class which has the scenario you describe:
class Person
{
static PrintName()
{
// Not legal, but let's say it is for now.
Console.WriteLine(Name);
}
private Name { get; set; }
}
Hopefully, the problem is apparent now. Because Name is an instance member, you need an actual instance of the class, since Name can be different across different instances.
Because of this, the static method, which is not attached to an instance, doesn't know which instance to use. You have to be explicit in specifying which one.
A static method cannot directly access any non-static member variables of a class.
After all : a static method can be called without an instance of the class even being in existance. How do you want to access a member variable on a non-existing instance??
(of course, as Mehrdad pointed out: you could pass an instance of your class to a static method and access everything on that instance - but that's not what you're talking about, right?)
Static functions can only use static members, and call static functions.
As mentioned, a static function can operate on a class instance, but not from within a class instance (for lack of a more descriptive word). For example:
class MyClass
{
public int x;
public static int y;
public static void TestFunc()
{
x = 5; // Invalid, because there is no 'this' context here
y = 5; // Valid, because y is not associated with an object instance
}
public static void TestFunc2(MyClass instance)
{
instance.x = 5; // Valid
instance.y = 5; // Invalid in C# (valid w/ a warning in VB.NET)
}
}
The definition of a "non static data member" would be an "instance data member". In other words non static members belong to a created instance of your class.
A static method does not run in the context of any specific instance of the class. Hence when you ask such a method to use a non static member it will have no idea which of the 0 or more instances of the class it should try to get the data from.
You can't access non-static data from a static function. This is because the static function can be called irrespective of whether there are any instantiated objects of the class. The non-static data, however, is dependent on a specific object (instantiation) of the class. Since you can't be sure that there are any objects instantiated when calling a static function, it is illogical (and therefore not allowed) to access non-static data from it.
This question has been asked several times on SO in different forms / for different languages:
C#
Java
Python
PHP
Language-independent